🛑 EdTech Founders: Your IVR is bleeding enrollments.
Students call → hit robotic menus → hang up in 11 sec.
3.4x higher bookings with AI Voice Agents that:
✅ Speak in your brand tone, 24/7
✅ Qualify leads in 42 seconds
✅ Book webinar slots while you sleep
Why Kipps.AI beats generic AI providers and IVR
🔹 EdTech-tuned scripts (trained on 100+ student calls)
🔹 12-min plug-and-play template (zero coding)
🔹 ₹0 upfront – pay only per conversation
Grab the AI Voice Bot Prompt Template used by most coaching giants → https://www.kipps.ai/templates/edtech-sales-agent
Book a demo to use: https://www.kipps.ai/contact-sales
Product: https://app.kipps.ai
hashtag#kippsai hashtag#coaching hashtag#edtech hashtag#jee hashtag#neet hashtag#revolution hashtag#teacher hashtag#AdaptOrPerish hashtag#startup hashtag#pwlive hashtag#ipo
I have the same question as @chen jie
The 3.4x increase refers to the improvement in converting cold leads into the funnel. The benchmark comes from leads that were previously not reached or engaged. These leads are collected organically through ad campaigns but typically receive little to no follow-up, making them a stable baseline for comparison
What is the benchmark for 3.4x?Is it compared to traditional human agents?Or compared to the existing IVR? Or no answer?
The 3.4x increase refers to the improvement in converting cold leads into the funnel. The benchmark comes from leads that were previously not reached or engaged. These leads are collected organically through ad campaigns but typically receive little to no follow-up, making them a stable baseline for comparison