GazeRank

I ran GazeRank on gazerank.com to see what it would tell me.

The score: 93/100, across 12 pages. That's good, but not perfect. Instead of 100+ findings, it gave me 5 fixes, ranked by impact:

1. Blocked AI crawlers. High impact, 10 minutes. The evidence lists Amazonbot and Bytespider as blocked in robots.txt.

2. Low content readability. Affects 12 pages. Fix: shorter sentences and shorter paragraphs.

3. Missing author information. Affects 9 pages.

4. No content freshness signals. Affects 5 pages. Fix: add "Last updated" dates.

5. Missing og:image tag on the blog. A 10-minute fix.

Each card shows the evidence, the owner (SEO or content), the time to fix, and a Verify this fix button, so I can make the change and confirm it worked.

AI visibility

GazeRank scores AI platform readiness at 85/100:

• Perplexity: 100

• ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini: 80 each

The misses are things like FAQ schema, author information, and Core Web Vitals.

Tracking progress

The report also shows my score history: 86 → 93 across 20 scans, plus what finishing the recommended fixes could be worth.

Try it on your site

Run a scan at gazerank.com. The first scan needs no signup.

Then tell me:

• Did the top fixes match what you'd have fixed first?

• Did it miss anything obvious?

• Would you use the verify step?

Drop your URL in the comments and I'll look at your results with you.

Strong SEO doesn't mean AI can find you.

Most audit tools will tell you your title tag is too long. None tell you whether GPTBot, ClaudeBot or PerplexityBot can actually reach your pages. And every scan ends the same way: 50, 100, sometimes 200+ findings, and no idea where to start.

GazeRank does two things:

1. Checks website health and AI search visibility in one scan

2. Shows you the top 3-5 priority fixes that matter most, instead of dumping a giant report on you

Try it free, no signup needed for the first scan: https://www.gazerank.com/

What it checks

SEO, performance, accessibility, technical health, security, content quality, structured data, DNS trust, and AI search readiness for ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini (crawler access, structured data, llms.txt, content structure and more).

The priority fixes, ranked

Each priority card shows:

• Why it's #1, #2, #3 and so on

• Impact, time to fix, and who owns it (SEO, content, developer)

• The affected page

• A concrete fix

• A Verify this fix button, plus Send to developer if it's not your job

It also flags quick wins you can finish in one sitting. The remaining findings are available after a free signup.

Verify the fix

The workflow is Scan → Prioritize → Fix → Verify → Monitor.

Make the change, click verify, and find out: "Did I actually fix it?"

• Issues tagged Automated verification (a missing title, a missing security header, a blocked crawler) are re-checked automatically.

• Issues tagged Needs developer, or that require judgment, aren't pretended away by an automated check. They're clearly separated for human review.

There's also a PDF export, shareable reports, and a Chrome extension for instant audits while browsing.

Feedback I'd love

Run a scan on your own site and tell me:

• Did the top fixes feel right, or did it miss something obvious?

• Where does the report still feel overwhelming?

• Did the verify step help you get from finding an issue to fixing it?

Run a scan at gazerank.com and drop your URL in the comments. I'll look at the results with you.