2
1 Comment

The story of how my product started selling after I stopped competing and changed markets

I used to think the problem was my app.

I had built a fitness app, and I was making short videos to explain how it worked: workout clips, app demos, daily routine content, and simple before/after-style videos.

But in the US market, it felt impossible to stand out.

Every post was competing with fitness influencers, personal trainers, large fitness apps, paid ads, gym brands, UGC creators, and hundreds of similar products.

The content was not terrible.

It just barely got seen.

At first, I thought I needed to improve the product.
Then I thought I needed better videos, better hooks, better editing, better captions, and better posting times.

But eventually, I started asking a different question:

What if the problem is not the app?

What if I am just trying to grow it in the wrong market?

That is when I started looking at Japan.

I learned that Japan has a growing interest in fitness and home workout content, and that Japan is one of the largest app-spending markets in the world, often ranked around third globally.

So I decided to test the same fitness app in Japan.

Same product.
Same type of videos.
Different market.

At first, I thought localization meant translating my captions into Japanese.

Japanese captions.
Japanese hooks.
Japanese hashtags.
Japanese posting times.

But I quickly realized something important:

Posting Japanese content does not automatically mean Japanese users will see it.

TikTok and Instagram do not seem to distribute content based only on language.

They also seem to consider account history, device environment, network location, SIM or phone-region signals, audience behavior, and early engagement.

So if you post from outside Japan, you might not actually be testing Japan.

You might only be showing Japanese-language content to the same audience pool the platform already connects with your account.

That creates a false negative.

You post 20 Japanese videos.
They do not perform.
Then you conclude:

“Japan does not want my app.”

But maybe the real answer is:

“Japan never really saw my app.”

Those are completely different lessons.

I did not want to rely on VPNs or fake location tricks, especially because platforms seem to be getting stricter about artificial geo setups.

So I looked for a way to test Japan through an actual Japan-local posting environment.

That is how I found Reach Japan Lab.

For me, the value was not just translation.

It was distribution.

They helped me post my existing app content through a Japan-local TikTok/Instagram setup, so I could test Japan more clearly instead of just translating my videos and hoping the algorithm would understand the target market.

That changed how I think about growth.

Sometimes the fastest experiment is not changing the product.

It is changing where the product competes.

A fitness app that looks average in the US might feel more interesting in Japan.
A small game that gets ignored in one market might work better in another.
The same could be true for language apps, fashion products, beauty products, and other visual products that can be explained through short-form video.

I am not saying Japan is the right market for every product.

But before rebuilding everything, I think more founders should ask:

Did the market reject the product?

Or did the market never really see it?

Sometimes growth does not come from changing the product.

Sometimes it comes from changing the battlefield.

The service I used to reliably reach the Japanese market:https://reachjapanlab.com/

on July 2, 2026
  1. 1

    What stood out to me is the reframing from “does the product work in this market” to “did the market actually get a fair chance to respond to the product.” That’s a subtle but important distinction. A lot of failed experiments aren’t product failures—they’re distribution mismatches that get misread as demand signals. Changing the battlefield often changes the interpretation of the same product entirely.