Title: Vibe coding made building easier. It didn’t make finding users easier.
Vibe coding has made it much easier to turn an idea into a working MVP.
But after building and launching multiple products, I kept running into the same problem:
I could build the product.
I could deploy it.
But I still had to answer:
Who should see it first?
Why would they care?
What should I say to them?
Where should I reach them?
And what result would actually count as validation?
The coding part was getting faster.
The marketing part was still a blank page.
So I built a small MVP called First Audience.
It is not another social media scheduler or an AI copy generator.
The current workflow helps a founder structure five things:
The goal is not to create a complete marketing strategy.
It is to help a builder move from:
“I launched something. Now what?”
to:
“This is the next audience, message, action, and signal I should test.”
I am now looking for a small group of beta testers.
I am especially interested in people who:
• built an MVP through vibe coding or AI-assisted development
• already have something live
• do not have an established audience
• are struggling to find their first serious users
• are willing to give direct and specific feedback
I want to learn:
• where the workflow feels too generic
• which recommendations are difficult to execute
• what information is missing
• whether the result changes the founder’s next action
• whether this is meaningfully different from asking ChatGPT for marketing advice
If this describes your current situation, you can try the MVP here:
https://first-audience-two.vercel.app/
I am not looking for compliments.
I am looking for evidence that the workflow is useful—or evidence that it needs to change.
What has been harder for you after vibe coding an MVP: building the product or finding the first users?