2
0 Comments

9$ vs 29$ vs "Pay as you go"

I kind of am in an intellectual struggle here. What pricing delivers a more premium feel without pushing smaller accounts away?

In German, there is a saying: "What costs nothing is worth nothing".

I launched Vatfy a couple of days ago and validated the idea beforehand. Long story short, lots like the idea and service, but it seems like my target audience is more "enterprise-y" and thus the low cost kind of deter them from purchase. After all, I do sell compliance in a way and they want to be sure that my service is there, after they integrate it into their payment flows.

This keeps me thinking if I should switch to a higher pricing model, but I also want to retain bootstrappers and indiehackers.

Current price structure is either free (with a lower monthly request limit), the standard plan with 9$/month and enterprise plans, which need to be negotiated.

I was thinking to increase the pricing to 29$ for the standard plan, and additionally add pay per use after a threshold of requests, which would enable me to put everyone on a standard plan, and just have the first couple of requests per month free of charge.

How would you tackle this dilemma?

What pricing delivers more a more premium feel without
  1. Keep freeplan, and keep standard plan at 9$/m
  2. Keep free plan, but raise the standard plan to 29$/m
  3. Remove free plan, and put everyone on a single plan
  4. Remove free plan, and put everyone on a pay as you go plan (threshold triggers monthly paid plan)
  5. Keep free plan, and put everyone on a standard plan for 29$ with a pay as you go addition
Vote
Trending on Indie Hackers
Customer acquisition when broke... 17 comments Facebook is (becoming) the new Yellow Pages 10 comments How do you read this logo? 6 comments What's the biggest challenge you face? 5 comments Our landing page only attracts users outside of the US during pre-registration. Any idea why? 2 comments How do I Build a Beverage Company in Public? 2 comments