Listen Up! IH - Episode 31
👆 That's how Nathan Baschez and Dan Shipper think about their startup - Every.
Every is a media company, writers collective, and also a bundle of business-focused newsletters that readers can subscribe to.
Nathan and Dan eventually want Every to cover every industry, every job role, every company, from waste management to wealth management.
That's why they named their business Every!
But it's not a traditional media company or magazine.
Every is structured as a writer collective, this means:
That's a win-win-win business model.
The Every story👇
Every is a bundle of business newsletters, with a focus on analysis and commentary instead of news and scoops.
Writers on Every write long-form pieces on business stories and trends with a practitioner's perspective. As the writers are running businesses of their own, they aren't journalists writing for a newspaper.
The focus is on utility - writing content that is most useful to the reader.
The Every bundle has 13 newsletters with topics ranging from productivity to business strategy to culture.
You can subscribe to them for $200/year or $20/month.
Every has around 2400 paying subscribers and 36000 free subscribers.
A 6% conversion from free to paying subscribers is above the industry standard of 5%.
While the industry average price of paid newsletters is $11, most newsletters in the Every bundle charge $15 a month standalone.
As a reader, if I like one or two newsletters in the bundle, then it makes total sense to subscribe to the whole bundle for $20 - even if you arent that interested in the others.
As a writer, Every is somewhere between a personal Substack and a traditional newspaper like the New York Times.
Every helps writers with money, distribution, editorial support, and branding.
Writers get a percentage of the subscription revenue. And if for some reason, they want to leave, they get their email list with them.
When a reader signs up, they are asked their primary newsletter choice. That newsletter writer gets 50% of that reader's revenue.
This is a fair way to split the revenue with writers, and it incentivizes writers to join the bundle without worrying about cannibalizing their own brand.
It's the ideal strategy to get influential writers like Tiago Forte joining the bundle.
This is how Nathan describes it -
"It's win-win for consumers because consumers get access to more stuff, more options for less money. It's a win for creators because consumers are spending a little bit extra than they normally would spend"
But this model didn't spring up suddenly out of the blue. Like most Indie Hacker stories, the Every story has humble beginnings.
It really started with Nathan and Dan's personal Substack newsletters.
Nathan had been successfully writing a business strategy newsletter called Divinations, and Dan had been writing a productivity newsletter called Superorganizers.
Both were paid newsletters hosted on Substack. Both were doing well, they had proven the concept of premium newsletters, and had built an audience for themselves.
But they were side projects, not standalone businesses.
Dan and Nathan wanted to test the next incremental step.
So they ran an experiment, bundled their newsletters into a 3rd newsletter called "The Everything Bundle"
At the time, they hadn't even incorporated a company. They just wanted to see how people would respond to the bundle -
"...first let's make a product that people want and will pay for..."
The Everything Bundle was an instant hit!
The revenue doubled overnight. Readers loved the concept of paying a slightly higher price for a ton of more value.
That's when they knew they had hit upon something valuable, something that could be a proper business.
Eventually, Nathan and Dan incorporated an entity when they touched the $10K MRR mark.
And they left Substack to host the bundle on their own platform.
Nathan was the first employee at Substack. He was their VP of Product, he understands the platform better than most people.
He thinks Substack is a great option for writers who already have a huge audience and have been writing for a long time. (like journalists quitting newspapers)
But Substack can be hard for someone just starting and still figuring out their newsletter offering.
It offers almost no distribution or editorial support. And when you start a paid newsletter, Substack takes a cut on every subscription, which is a terrible model for any writer trying to scale.
Nathan and Dan realized one thing - great writers have always had mentors and a community to help them hone their craft, refine their writing and make it useful to the readers.
Writers need support.
That's hard to get on Substack.
Plus you get very few customization options when you write on Substack.
If Nathan and Dan wanted full control over the user experience of their newsletter, it had to move on from Substack.
So they built their own content management system, and migrated their content to it.
That's when "the everything bundle" became "Every."
This a constant cycle in business.
Small businesses grow horizontally till they are so big that they can be unbundled vertically. Giving birth to more vertical small businesses.
Substack unbundled the newspaper. Individual writers could quit their jobs at prestigious publications like The New York Times, start their own Substacks, and capture a lot more of the value they were creating.
But once a few Substacks grow big enough, it doesn't make sense for them to stay on the platform. They can go on their own, or better still, team up with a bunch of similar writers and offer a bundle.
When they launched the platform, Dan and Nathan wrote a long essay explaining the concept of Every. They explained their model, their editorial and financial structure, their idea of a writing collective.
And they spoke about what this project means to them, how they think about Every -
"In our best moments, the way we think about what we’re doing is this: The magic of writing is that it can make readers feel less alone in the world. The magic of a writer collective is, perhaps, that it can make writers feel less alone in the world. It has for us. And that is the point."
Let's look at the key lessons from Every's story👇
Every grows mostly from word of mouth, they don't do "content marketing", their content IS marketing.
This is Nathan and Dan's strategy -
2 More strategies for newsletter growth -
This reflects in Every's traffic as well.
Of 353K visits in the last 6 months, about 60% is direct traffic on the websites - their regular readers.
Their top ranking keywords are names of newsletters in their bundle, or titles of their articles -
What we can learn from their landing page - every.to
Indie hacker startups you can acquire from microacquire.com or get inspired by to build your own -
Thank you for reading🙏
ICYMI : Last week I wrote about the real estate SaaS - The Agent Nest.
You can read the back catalog of all the posts so far on the Listen Up IH website
Every week, I share the most actionable insights and inspiring tips from successful Indie Hackers FOR aspiring Indie Hackers
Ideas + Insights + Inspiration for building profitable internet businesses💪
Sign up to Listen Up! IH and join 1500+ spirited Indie Hackers who read this newsletter every week.
Thanks to Seth King for editing this post
Google trends chart courtesy UnderTheRadar.io.
Cheers,