I crunched the data on 100 artists who have earned $100k-$199k revenue in NFT sales to find out what they were creating, where they were selling and what scale of audience they had. Here are five key insights I found:
Also, having a larger audience did not necessarily mean that artists could achieve a higher sales price per NFT. As the plot below shows having a significantly bigger audience did not have a proportionate effect on average sales price. Artists with smaller and perhaps more engaged audiences earned just as much, if not more, from each NFT as their more popular counterparts.
Parameters: These stats include sales made on MakersPlace, KnownOrigin, Nifty Gateway, Foundation and Async Art. All the numbers are based on initial sales only, not the cut of secondary sales taken by the artists.
Hope you found this interesting!
If you would like (and would pay for) the detailed data I drew these insights from go to: https://gum.co/dhmVuZ. You could mine the database for leads for your NFT product or service, pick a new artist to add to your collection based on the stats or even find some inspiration for your budding NFT art career in the galleries of the sampled creators.
Let me know in the comments what other NFT art data or NFT artist demographics you’d like to see broken down 👇
Thanks for posting Kofi! Super insightful. 2D without animation actually beat 3D with animation. that's completely opposite of what I thought would happen.
Glad you found it interesting 😁. I was also super surprised to see that result. Scrolling through the feeds of curated platforms it feels like you see a ton of animated 3D models.
But what I found is that all kinds of styles are represented amongst the ranks of the high earners. Stuff I'd never expect like @reillystasienko selling 70ETH worth of oil painting NFTs and @thisisaddictive finding similar success from periodic table memes.