Hi in many cases with deciding in a meeting about priorities its the loudest person which gets her/his tasks on the top of the prio list. In addition it's not so easy to be correct and not biased with deciding which feature is the 5th important for e.g. a to be bought software with 20 features which are somehow important for you. There are methods like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pairwise_comparison but I'm looking for alternatives and your experiences with something like this. The pairwise comparison seem to be very time consuming if you compare everything with everything.