Shipped StageAuto v1.0.5 and v1.0.6: Audit Reports and Infrastructure Scorecards
Just shipped two new updates for StageAuto.
StageAuto analyzes Terraform infrastructure and generates security, compliance, architecture, and cost reports before deployment.
v1.0.5 focused on reporting improvements:
• Terraform fix examples inside PDF reports
• Automatic remediation snippets
• SOC 2, ISO 27001 and CIS mappings
• Better audit-style reports for B2B customers
• More actionable recommendations
v1.0.6 focused on executive visibility:
• Infrastructure Scorecard
• Security Score
• Architecture Score
• Compliance Score
• Cost Score
• Overall Infrastructure Health Score
• Color-coded risk visualization
The goal is making infrastructure reviews easier for both technical and non-technical stakeholders.
Still improving the product every week and collecting feedback from the cloud community.
Website:
https://stageauto-site.netlify.app
The interesting shift here isn't the new reports—it's making infrastructure understandable to people who don't live in Terraform every day.
A lot of technical products create value by generating more information. The harder problem is turning that information into something different stakeholders can actually make decisions from.
Exactly.
That was one of the main goals behind the recent updates.
Security findings are useful, but if non-technical stakeholders cannot understand the impact or the recommended actions, the review process becomes much harder.
The new scorecards, compliance mappings, and remediation examples are intended to bridge that gap and make infrastructure discussions easier for everyone involved.
Happy to share.
What's the best email to reach you on? I think it'll be easier to explain the thought properly there.
Happy to continue the discussion here as well.
I completely agree that translating technical findings into business decisions is one of the hardest parts of infrastructure reviews.
That has been one of the main directions for StageAuto recently, especially with scorecards, compliance mappings, and remediation examples.
Curious to hear your thoughts on how you've seen teams bridge that gap in practice.
I think we're getting into something that's difficult to unpack properly in a thread.
Happy to share the fuller thought.
What's the best email to reach you on?
Thanks, Aryan.
I prefer keeping discussions here on IndieHackers for now, but I appreciate your interest.
Feel free to share your thoughts in the thread if you'd like. I'd be happy to read them.
Fair enough.
I don't think I'd do the idea justice in a thread, so I'll leave it there. Looking forward to seeing how this evolves.