Most of us still build for weeks before anyone actually uses the product.
You don’t need to do that. Here’s how people can start using a “fake” version of your product in a day using AI.
To make this easy to follow, we’ll use a sample product. We'll call it ReplyBuddy.
ReplyBuddy takes a long, angry email from a customer and turns it into a short, calm reply you can send.
You can replace ReplyBuddy with your own idea. The steps are the same.
Take your full feature list and cut it down to this one action: user going from X to Y.
For ReplyBuddy, that is: “In this demo, a founder goes from a long angry customer email to a short, calm reply they can send.”
If something does not help that X → Y change, don’t include it in the demo.
Next, write down the data your tool needs for that action.
Keep it very simple. No code. Just a list.
For ReplyBuddy, it needs:
Later, the demo will output:
Write it like this:
Inputs:
- product_name
- product_one_line
- angry_email_text
- reply_tone
- key_point
- do_not_say
Output:
- reply_text
That’s the “shape” of your demo. You will keep this shape the same, no matter how you build it.
Now, write the exact messages your fake product will say. Do this in a doc first.
Here is a full script for ReplyBuddy. Use it as an example from which to base your own script.
“Hi, I’m ReplyBuddy. I turn long, angry customer emails into short, calm replies. We’ll do this in 2–3 minutes. Ready to start? (yes / no)”
“First, tell me about your product. What is your product called?”
(wait for answer)
“And in one short sentence, what does it do?”
“Now paste one real angry customer email. Paste the full message. No need to clean it.”
“How do you want to sound in your reply?
“What is one thing you want to make sure is said?”
Examples might include, “We fixed the bug” or, ‘We’ve initiated a refund.”
“Is there anything you do NOT want to say?
Example: ‘Do not offer a refund here’ or ‘Do not promise a date for a new feature.’
Now you have all the data you said you’d need. Time to show the “magic”.
Now decide how the answer will look.
Even if it’s plain text, treat it as a screen.
Shape first, content later.
For ReplyBuddy, you might use this layout:
Here's a draft of your reply:
-----------------------------------------
Product: SimpleBoard
Tone: calm and friendly
Key point: We fixed the bug already
Reply:
Hi [Customer Name],
[short calm opening written with empathy\]
[short explanation of what happened and what you did\]
[clear next step or offer]
Best,
[Your Name]
-----------------------------------------
Would you send this as-is?
1) Yes
2) Almost - I'll tweak a few words
3) No - this doesn't feel right
This layout is always the same:
Later, when you call the AI, you tell it: “Use this template. Don’t change the layout.”
That way, your demo feels like a real tool.
We want the demo to teach you, not just impress users.
After the reply, ask:
“Four quick questions:
The demo steps don’t change. Only where it runs changes.
You can put it in:
We’ll begin with the chat-style AI agent, since that’s what most people mean when they say “AI agent”.
You can use any chat AI tool, for example:
The idea is the same in all of them.
a) Create the agent
Open your agent builder tool. Start a new agent (add your instructions into the system).
Tell it this (Staying with our example):
You are ReplyBuddy.
You help solo founders turn angry customer emails into calm replies.
Your job:
* Use the script from Step 3.
* Ask each question exactly as it is written.
* Ask the questions in the same order.
* After you get all the answers, write the reply in the layout below.
* Then ask the four feedback questions from Step 5.
* Then say goodbye to the user.
Rules:
* Use very simple language.
* Ask ONE question at a time.
* Stay on one topic.
* Do NOT say that you are an AI or a prototype.
Layout for the reply:
"Here's your reply draft:
Product: [product_name]
Tone: \[reply_tone]
Key point: [key_point\]
Reply:
Hi [Customer Name],
[full reply text here]
Best,
[Your Name]
-----------------------------------------"
Tell the agent: always use this layout.
In the flow editor:
Save each answer in a variable (product_name, angry_email, and so on). Use those variables in the LLM block.
Publish the agent. You’ll get a link.
Users can then:
No backend needed. You just used an AI agent with your script.
If you don’t want chat, you can use a simple form.
In Make / Zapier:
In the AI step, send a prompt that:
Then email that reply to the user.
At the bottom of the email, you can add a small link to another form with the 3 feedback questions.
If you write code, you can do this:
Under the reply, add a second small form with:
Send this feedback to a simple endpoint. Save it in a database or even in a CSV file.
Nothing more is needed for v0.
Give your demo to:
The main value of this demo is what it can teach you. So, log:
Then look for patterns. If you get preliminary validation, your v1.0 roadmap should come directly from this.
This is a great guide! I remember starting out and literally trying to do everything under the sun. Building with one coreflow is much better leading to faster shipping and testing in public.
The initial hump of finding users is the real struggle, especially if you don't have a large following. These are solid steps to validate a prototype. Often times we spend way too much time building and wasting time, but validation is a must!
Hey I am Nazel 7 years old from India currently doing exactly this with my startup idea I build a simple landing page or carrd.co in 30 minutes we need and connected it to a Google form for email signals no coding needed at all my biggest learning so far is that the landing page headline matches more than a design if the headline speaks directly to a real paint people will sign up even if the page looks basic I would love to hear what quick prototyping methods others have used
This is a super practical reminder that “validation” doesn’t require a full product just a fast way to let people experience the outcome.
I like the framing of shipping a usable fake in a day (especially with AI) so you can test demand, messaging, and willingness to use/pay before you invest weeks of engineering.
It matches what I’ve seen too: the quickest prototypes aren’t about perfect UX, they’re about getting real user behavior and learning what actually matters.
Solid guide. The biggest insight here isn't the tooling — it's the discipline of shipping something testable in a single day instead of polishing for weeks.
One thing I've learned the hard way: the "quick and dirty" part only works if you can actually sit down and focus for 2-3 hours straight. Most of us can't because we're alt-tabbing to Twitter/Reddit/HN every 10 minutes.
I started using Monk Mode (mac.monk-mode.lifestyle) to block distractions during build sessions and it legitimately cut my prototype time in half. Not because the code got easier, but because I stopped interrupting myself.
The framework above + 3 hours of uninterrupted focus = a testable prototype by end of day.
Really liked the framing around “one core action” — it’s such a simple constraint but it forces clarity. Most founders (myself included) instinctively jump to building features instead of validating the transformation the user actually wants. The X → Y lens makes it obvious what the prototype should prove and what can safely be ignored.
The other underrated point here is that a prototype doesn’t need to be “software.” It can be a manual workflow, a prompt, a form, or even a concierge service — anything that lets a real user experience the outcome. That mindset dramatically shortens the feedback loop.
I’ve noticed that the biggest shift happens when founders treat prototypes as learning tools rather than early versions of the product. When the goal is learning, you optimize for speed and insight instead of polish.
The “one core action” idea really resonates.
As a developer I often catch myself thinking about architecture and features way too early. Reducing it to a single X → Y transformation is a good mental trick.
Curious if people here have tried validating ideas without building any UI at all first? Like just running the workflow manually for a few users.
Great framework! The "quick and dirty" approach is underrated. When I started TubeSpark (tubespark.ai), I validated by manually running AI prompts for YouTube creators before building any UI. The insight was that creators cared about idea quality, not the interface — so I invested heavily in the AI pipeline first and shipped a basic frontend. What's the shortest validation cycle you've seen actually work?
Analytics tools are changing a lot recently. Privacy-focused alternatives are becoming more popular.
great idea - thank you for this practical guide
The “one core action” insight is powerful.
I'm currently validating Gnobu using a simple Google Form prototype before building the full system.
Early feedback already shows how important it is to test the problem first, not just the technology.
This is such a practical guide! I love the focus on building a “quick and dirty” prototype — sometimes speed and iteration are more important than perfection when testing an idea. It’s a great reminder that validating assumptions early can save a lot of time and resources later. I often explore startup and product development tips online (sometimes checking out sites like jennymodapk), and posts like this give really actionable advice for anyone looking to bring their ideas to life.
The "One Core Action" is indeed the key here. I am working in a giant tech company with so many product lines. And very often, people get into debate the features scope of a new product, and it usually ends up with a bloating roadmap. When I bring that roadmap to talk to the targeted customers / users, most of the case they only want 1 or 2 key features. And the interesting thing is those key, needed features are usually placed last in terms of priority.
This is solid advice. The 'one core action' framing is key. I've fallen into the trap of building way too much before showing it to anyone.
One thing I'd add: the prototype doesn't even need to work end-to-end. For one of my apps I literally used a Google Form connected to a spreadsheet as the 'MVP' and sent it to 20 people. The ones who actually filled it out and came back asking for more told me everything I needed to know. Took maybe 2 hours.
The hardest part isn't building the prototype. It's accepting that your idea might not survive contact with real users. Most of mine didn't. But the ones that did were way stronger for it.
fantastic guide
the "validate distribution before you build" step is the one that actually stops most people — the form prototype approach makes that concrete though. you can have something testable in a day and know if anyone actually wants it before writing a single line of real code
The angry email example is a smart pick because it's immediately obvious whether the output is useful. You read the reply and either think "yeah I'd send that" or "no way".
One thing I'd add - even before building the fake version, spending a day in forums/communities where your target users hang out can tell you whether the problem is real. Lots of ideas feel validated because friends say "oh cool" but the actual people who'd pay are a different story.
Nice, I am sure that IA will help boost such product, but in the end, will there be enough real peole to test massive numbers of products?
the guide that every early stage entrepreneur needs rn!