2
1 Comment

I built OnSkillDemand to replace gut-feel hiring with structured evidence

Technical interviews often end with scattered notes, inconsistent questions, and opinions that are difficult to compare.
We built OnSkillDemand to organize hiring around each vacancy—from requirements and candidates to interview rounds, AI-assisted questions, notes, evidence, scores, and reports.
AI helps prepare and organize the work. Recruiters and interviewers make every evaluation and final decision.
It’s available on iOS and Android, and we’re looking for honest feedback from recruiters, hiring managers, and technical interviewers.
What makes interviews inconsistent in your team today? Which integrations would make OnSkillDemand useful in your workflow?
iPhone: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/onskilldemand/id6802425299
Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ideaintech.onskilldemand

, Founder of Icon for OnSkillDemand
OnSkillDemand
on September 14, 2026
  1. 1

    The evidence-based positioning makes sense, but the real test seems to be whether it changes decisions rather than just organizing notes better. Have any hiring teams used OnSkillDemand across multiple candidates and found that the structured evidence changed or clarified a hiring decision?