I’ve been talking with a few developer friends about AI-assisted programming lately, and I've noticed an interesting pattern: almost everyone is using AI to write code, but 80% of them are falling into the exact same traps.
These pitfalls don’t just fail to boost productivity; they actually make projects messier. Today, I want to talk about these three common traps and how I've started using a tool called Crevo to solve them.
You have an idea and you tell ChatGPT: "Write the shopping cart feature for my e-commerce site."
The AI quickly generates a block of code that seems to work. You copy-paste it, find a few bugs, and ask the AI to fix them. After that, you realize it's not compatible with your existing codebase, so you ask for another revision. This cycle repeats, and half a day later, your feature is just a pile of patches.
The AI has no idea about your system architecture, tech stack, or business logic. It's just guessing based on your one-sentence prompt.
It's like hiring a construction crew without giving them a blueprint and just saying, "Build me a modern-style house." You can imagine how that’s going to turn out.
Your product manager says, "Let's add Stripe payments."
You immediately ask an AI to generate the payment integration code, plug in the Stripe SDK, and it looks like you're done. But after going live, you discover:
An AI can generate code snippets, but it won't handle system-level architecture design or risk assessment for you. A complete payment feature involves business processes, data models, API design, error handling, and more. If you just stack AI-generated code without a system design document, you're heading for disaster.
You're halfway through a project when a new developer joins the team. You spend thirty minutes explaining the business logic, but they're still completely lost.
There's no PRD, no architecture diagram, and no API documentation. All the critical information is in your head. The new hire has to guess by reading the code—and when they guess wrong, they code wrong, leading to rework.
AI can generate code, but it won't automatically create the comprehensive design docs and collaboration infrastructure your team needs. Software engineering is a team sport, not an act of individual heroism. Without documentation as a "common language," team efficiency plummets.
After hitting these walls, I started to reflect. The problem with AI-generated code is fundamentally a lack of a "design-first" approach.
So I started experimenting with a new workflow:
That's when I discovered Crevo, a tool that fit my new workflow perfectly.
Crevo is an AI documentation service built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), specifically designed to solve the "missing documentation" problem.
Let me show you the power of Crevo with a real use case.
Scenario: Adding a "Team Collaboration" feature to my SaaS platform.
I told the Crevo chatbot:
"I want to add team collaboration features to my SaaS platform. Users should be able to create workspaces, invite team members with different roles (admin, editor, viewer), and manage permissions for shared resources."
Crevo automatically generated a detailed user story document, including:
Continuing the conversation, Crevo generated a complete Product Requirements Document (PRD):
Next, Crevo produced an architecture design document that defined:
Crevo then generated detailed business process diagrams and state machines for all key flows.
From there, Crevo generated a complete data model, including table schemas, field definitions, and relationships.
Crevo automatically generated a RESTful API specification with endpoints, request/response formats, error codes, and auth methods.
Finally, Crevo produced a detailed development plan with task breakdowns, milestones, and risk assessments.
Once I had this complete set of design documents, my workflow transformed:
The results:
Crevo uses a session-based mechanism where each document generated becomes an input for the next. This solves the "short-term memory" problem of traditional AI tools. Every step builds on the last, ensuring a logically consistent whole.
Crevo has multiple AI models integrated (OpenAI GPT, Claude, Google Gemini, Ollama) and can be configured to use the best model for each document type. You don't have to switch manually; Crevo chooses for you, ensuring high-quality output every time.
Built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), Crevo can be used directly inside Claude Desktop. Configuration is dead simple—just add one line to your config file:
{
"mcpServers": {
"crevo": {
"url": "[https://crevo-mcp.aurakl.ai/mcp?key=YOUR_MCP_KEY_HERE](https://crevo-mcp.aurakl.ai/mcp?key=YOUR_MCP_KEY_HERE)"
}
}
}
After that, you can generate documents right from your chat, keeping your entire workflow in one place.
If you're one of the following, Crevo can be a game-changer:
👨💼 Role: Product Manager
👩💻 Role: Tech Architect
📊 Role: Project Manager
🧑💻 Role: Indie Developer
👥 Role: Startup Team
Many people assume that in the age of AI, documentation will disappear because "AI can write the code now."
But my experience has taught me the exact opposite: in the age of AI, design documents are more important than code.
Why?
So, stop asking an AI to blindly generate code. First, use Crevo to generate your design documents. Then, let the AI generate code on the right track. That is the right way to do AI-assisted development.
🔗 Website: https://crevo.aurakl.ai
📖 Docs: https://crevo.aurakl.ai/docs
💬 Community: Join our Discord
Your point on design docs being more important than code is huge. Now you need space to build Crevo not chase users. Imagine a flow that puts your solution in front of the perfect tech leads and PMs automatically, so you can focus on the product. That's how you get your first real fans. Happy to go for a partnership here :)