5 weeks building in public. Today I opened Pulseboard early access. Here is everything it caught on the way.
For the last five weeks I have posted the weekly build log for Pulseboard, the marketing analytics tool I am building for service-business agencies. Today it stops being a thing you watch me build and becomes a thing you can use. Early access is open.
Before the pitch, the receipts. Here is what the tool actually caught while I ran it on Movou's own marketing, which is the only honest way I know to sell an analytics product.
Week 2 to 3: our own agency site earned 1,062 organic Google impressions in fourteen days and exactly one click. Seven of eight priority keywords were ranking on page one or two. The rankings were fine. The titles were losing the click at the position they already held. GSC shows position and CTR in separate tabs, so the dead click bar never sits next to the healthy rank.
Week 3 to 4: the same Facebook hook run twice in eight days. First instance, around 295 impressions. The repeat, 13. That second-time penalty disappears inside Facebook Insights' seven day rolling average, so you publish two more before you notice.
This week: a business I ran through it was posting on Facebook with the blog link in the post body every time. Native posts averaged ~184 impressions. Link-in-body posts averaged 14. A 13x reach gap, paid silently, because the algorithm quietly suppresses outbound links and no dashboard puts those two averages side by side.
None of that is exotic. It is all sitting in data the owner already has. The dashboard just never says it out loud. Pulseboard's whole job is to say it out loud and rank the fix by what moves the number most this week.
I am opening to a small founding group first, with founding member pricing that will not come back. I want feedback from people running real marketing, not from a clean demo.
What is the find your own analytics buried that you only caught months later? And if you have built in public to a launch, how did you handle the moment it stops being a build log and becomes a product you have to charge for?
Early access: getpulseboard.ai
I have been working on two websites, a travel blog and an informational job blog. According to GSC, they were doing really well. For a few weeks, I was over the moon, with high rankings, great keywords, etc. Only after the second or third week did it hit me that the meteoric rises were not matched by clicks. Anything that catches this sort of thing, with reasons, has to be good. Well done, Chris
The strongest part of Pulseboard is that it is not trying to show agencies more data. It is showing them the expensive thing the dashboard failed to say clearly.
That is a much better story than “marketing analytics tool.”
The examples make the product feel real: rankings without clicks, repeated hooks getting punished, link posts quietly killing reach. Those are not vanity metrics. They are hidden leaks inside channels the business already uses.
I’d lean harder into that frame: Pulseboard as the layer that turns buried marketing data into the next fix, ranked by what can move this week.
The only thing I’d be careful with is the name/domain frame. Pulseboard is clean, but it still sounds close to a dashboard. If the product becomes more of a marketing intelligence layer for agencies, Beryxa .com would carry that broader direction better. It sounds less like another board and more like a serious analytics product agencies can put in front of clients.
The product already has a sharper promise than the name suggests: not “see your marketing,” but “find what is silently costing you growth.”