2
3 Comments

A useful comment turned into a paid GTM breakdown. Here’s what I learned.

One thing I’m learning from Indie Hackers:

Founders usually don’t need more generic advice.

They need someone to name the exact bottleneck clearly enough that the next step becomes obvious.

Recently I replied to a founder building an early marketplace.

The surface problem looked like distribution.

But the real issue was more specific: the marketplace needed a sharper first buyer segment, better expert-side seeding, stronger brief templates, and a manual path to the first real transactions.

That conversation turned into a paid written GTM breakdown.

No call. No big pitch. Just a practical doc focused on what to do next.

The lesson for me:

Early founders don’t pay for “strategy” in the abstract.

They care when the advice is tied to a specific outcome:

getting first users
finding the right buyer segment
turning feedback into buyer signal
fixing positioning before a launch
testing one channel without wasting weeks

I’m also noticing that small written deliverables are underrated.

A founder does not always need a full consultant, a long call, or a giant plan.

Sometimes they need one sharp diagnosis, one focused document, and one clear next action.

If you’re building something early and feel stuck between “the product works” and “I don’t know who to reach first,” that is usually where the real GTM problem starts.

on June 4, 2026
  1. 1

    I think you're right. A startup is as complex a product as art-creating something with no prior experience. And at the start, like in the infatuation phase of a relationship, there's a founder's blindness, a kind of being dazzled by your own product. What follows is a long, painful, thorny road back to reality- where users are cold and the market couldn't care less :)

  2. 1

    Really liked the point that founders don't buy strategy in the abstract, they buy the next clear step. Curious, do you use AI when creating these GTM breakdowns or is your process mostly manual?

    1. 1

      Good question.

      I use AI as a support layer for research, organization, and exploring information. The actual evaluation and judgment is still manual — understanding what the evidence supports and what decision it should inform.

      That’s the idea behind Beryxa: https://beryxa.com

      We help founders get independent written strategic evaluations before making important decisions — not more ideas, but clearer judgment on the decisions that matter.