Anyone else rebuild the same brief every time they switch AI tools?
I bounce between two assistants on the same side project and keep losing “what’s the actual next step.” Chat history doesn’t travel; I end up reconciling parallel versions or searching old threads before I can continue.
I’ve been testing a small private vault that sits between the tools: same project state, explicit handoff, second AI picks up without a pasted re-brief. Not asking for testimonials — looking for people who already do multi-AI work and will tell me where continuity breaks (outcomes only, no prompts/client data).
If that’s you: https://arkoncybersecurity.com/first-five (async, 30–45 min, optional). Solo is $12/mo if you’d rather skip the program: https://vault.arkoncybersecurity.com/billing
Curious how others handle cross-tool continuity today without a shared project store.
The $12/mo price makes the workflow test more interesting. Are early users keeping the vault in their regular AI workflow, or only using it when handoffs become painful?
This is one of those problems that gets more painful the more AI tools you use. The annoying part isn't just rewriting the brief — it's reconstructing all the context that didn't make it into the brief in the first place.
Especially the decisions, constraints, and things you already tried and ruled out. A new tool can understand the current request while still missing the history behind it.
Curious how you're handling that today — one canonical context file, tool-specific instructions, or just rebuilding it each time?