In 2020, @fsig and I launched Adflow.ai, paving the way for the usage of Generative AI models (GPT-3) in writing ad copy. Although we discontinued the project in 2021, our passion for GPT and language models has only continued to grow and evolve.
And now, we are thrilled to announce our latest project: FinetuneGPT. We have quickly put together a landing page for the project and would love to get feedback from fellow IHers! We have ideas on what we would improve, but I'd like to know from you.
Check it out here 👉 https://finetune-gpt.com
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
The website is entirely broken with latest Firefox running on Linux. All I get is a blank page. That's not a great start.
In Chrome and Windows I can see the website.
The website itself seems pretty clear and it's visually alright to look at. The FAQ area's UX is weird, because I need to click a very specific area of the question for the answer to show up. The entire area of the question should be clickable.
Also, in the FAQ area, the answers are not very easy to read because the use of gray font color over a dark blue background. There is not enough contrast between the text and the background. There is no reason to use gray font like this.
Similar problem exists also in other parts of the website, such as in the Join Pilot area, where you have dark blue font over a light blue background. You might think this looks visually pleasing to use similar colors, but what you are actually doing is making your texts more difficult to read.
The lack of pricing information makes me not want to investigate this for my business needs. I understand this is in alpha and this stage will be free. But there is no information at all how much it is going to cost when it launches, and that's a major red flag for me. You should provide at least an estimate.
There is no privacy policy type information in regards what are you doing with the emails you are collecting.
I think the landing page is rather clear on what you are offering, except the lack of pricing information. Visually it looks alright, except for some of the odd font color choices reducing text readability.
@jv16 what a detailed and honest feedback! we admittedly tried to get the page out in a short time to see if the interest would be there. However, I can see how some of these things may be off putting. We will to address these painpoints and better clarify the areas you mentioned 💪
Looking forward to hearing feedback from the community!