2
5 Comments

Building a creator monetization backend for recurring revenue — looking for feedback

I’m building Ascend AI, a backend that helps creators turn their knowledge, systems, or audience into ongoing digital products instead of one-off launches.

The idea:

  • recurring revenue > launches

  • built-in referrals instead of paid ads

  • no custom tech or constant rebuilding

Still early. Actively validating distribution + monetization with real users.

Curious:

If you’ve worked with creators or run digital products, what was hardest to validate early demand, pricing, or distribution?

Would love honest takes.

posted toAvatar for product Ascend AI
Ascend AI
  1. 1

    researching creator product formats from a ux dev angle for creators already selling courses or coaching do you see more demand for paid communities simple apps quizzes or ai assistants

  2. 1

    Congratulations on your launch. It looks impressive! What channels are you exploring to attract early users?

  3. 1

    Love the framing — recurring revenue and built‑in referrals address two pain points most creators struggle with. In my experience the hardest part early on isn’t the tech — it’s finding the first cohort of users who actually pay, stick, and refer. That usually comes down to how you define who your perfect creator customer is and how sharp your early pricing promise is (e.g., what exact outcome they get in the first 30–60 days).

    Curious — how are you currently validating demand vs. pricing vs. distribution signals? Are you watching sign‑ups, trial conversions, referral activity, or something else to decide what to optimize next?

    1. 1

      Hey man,

      Thanks — spot on with the framing. Recurring rev + referrals are the holy grail for creators, but yeah, the real grind is getting that first cohort who pay, stick, and actually promote.

      Quick rundown on how I'm validating right now:

      Demand / ICP sharpening Mostly watching who lands on the site → joins Discord → speaks up or requests access. The signal so far: almost everyone engaging is a creator already making $1k–$10k/mo (courses, coaching, merch, small SaaS). They want Ascend as an extra monetization layer (quick affiliate setup, AI landing pages, automations) without hiring devs. Total beginners are lurking but not converting yet — so ICP is leaning toward “hustling creators who already have an audience/product.”

      Pricing validation $5 / $15 / $25 founder-locked tiers. Zero complaints about price — the $5 entry is basically “why not” money, and $25 feels fair for unlimited builds + full affiliate tools. No one has asked for free yet, which is a good sign the low tier is doing its job as a hook.

      Distribution / referral signals Referral activity is basically flat right now — classic chicken-egg. I don’t have enough active users getting wins yet for anyone to grab their link and run. That’s the next unlock.

      What I'm tracking to decide next moves

      • Site → Discord join rate

      • Discord lurkers vs. active askers

      • First paying conversions (goal: 20–50 in next 30 days)

      • Once paid: who sticks past week 1 and what they actually build first

      • Who naturally shares their affiliate link (even if just to one friend)

      Plan for the next 30 days is pure validation sprint:

      • Launch posts on Indie Hackers + r/SaaS today/tomorrow to pull in the first wave

      • Collect real “in 30 days you’ll have X built and Y earning” stories

      • Use those wins to boost commissions (50–60%) for the earliest active promoters and kick the referral flywheel

      Curious what you’ve seen work best for that first cohort — did you go super narrow on ICP early, or cast wide and let data tighten it? And any red flags you watch for when someone signs up but doesn’t stick?

      Appreciate the insight 🚀

      1. 1
        The $1k–$10k/month creator segment sounds like the right ICP to focus on. These creators already have an audience and a working offer, so you’re testing whether Ascend can replace a painful workflow — not whether they might want to monetize someday. From building Nemiling, a Telegram monetization platform, I’d add two metrics: time from creator signup to the first customer payment, and the percentage of subscribers who make a second payment. Week-one activity can be curiosity; a second payment is much stronger evidence of recurring value. One caution: a 50–60% affiliate commission may generate referrals that disappear when the incentive drops. I’d track organic and commission-driven referrals separately, along with retention by source. If Ascend owns the checkout or subscription layer, can it track the full journey from product creation to first sale and second payment?