Building an AI Newsletter Platform as a Solo Founder — Looking for Beta Testers (€0 Budget, Early Validation)

The dropout data you collected is genuinely interesting — tracking 15 people from intent to abandonment is exactly the kind of qualitative research that most solo founders skip. That "6-9 hours a week" quote is a real insight because it frames the problem in time, not quality, which changes what the solution needs to be.

One thing worth pressure-testing: the 350+ AI newsletters that launched in 2025 — were those abandoned because of the same time constraint, or because AI-generated content isn't differentiating enough to build an audience? The failure mode might matter for how you position Scrivix. If it's "AI helps you save time," you're competing on efficiency. If it's "AI helps you be consistent," that's a different emotional hook and probably stickier.

Happy to be a beta tester if you're still looking — I run a niche tool for indie game developers so I understand the "small but passionate audience" distribution challenge from the creator side.

I wanna test it

We are looking for someone who can lend our holding company 200,000 US dollars.

We are looking for an investor who can lend our holding company 200,000 US dollars.

We are looking for an investor who can invest 200,000 US dollars in our holding company.

With the 200,000 US dollars you will lend to our holding company, our finance team will invest the money in the stock market and some business sectors, thus making a significant profit for both of us.

With your 200,000 US dollars investment in our holding company, our finance team will invest it in the stock market and 4 different business sectors, significantly increasing our profits within a few months.

Your 200,000 US dollars investment in our holding company will be invested by our finance team in the stock market and several business sectors.

The 200,000 US dollars you will invest in our holding company will be used by our finance team in the stock market and in 4 different business areas.

Which business sectors will be invested in?

Money will be increased by investing in major sectors such as cybersecurity, software, furniture, and e-commerce.

With the 200,000 US dollars you have invested in our holding company, we will invest in major sectors such as cybersecurity, software, furniture, and e-commerce.

With the $200,000 USD budget you've invested in our holding company, we will significantly increase our profits within just a few months by investing in high-market sectors such as cybersecurity, software, furniture, and e-commerce.

If we use the 200,000 US dollars you invested in our holding company across four different business sectors, our earnings will increase rapidly.

By dividing the 200,000 US dollars into different business areas, we will reduce the loss rate to zero.

By investing the 200,000 US dollars you lent to our holding company in the stock market and four different business areas, we will rapidly increase the rate of return on investment.

We will use the 200,000 US dollars you lent to our holding company to rapidly increase our profits by investing in sectors such as stock market and cybersecurity, software, furniture, and e-commerce.

Our finance team will use the 200,000 US dollars you lent to our holding company to invest in the stock market and in high-market sectors such as cybersecurity, software, furniture, and e-commerce.

By using 200,000 US dollars in 4 different business sectors, we will generate a significant amount of income within a few months.

So how will we market the products we produce?

Thanks to our strong advertising network, we will be able to sell the products we produce quickly.

Thanks to our strong advertising network, we will quickly find customers for the products and projects we will produce.

Thanks to our strong advertising network, we will attract a large audience to our projects, which means we will quickly generate significant revenue.

By using WhatsApp groups, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook groups, TikTok, Telegram groups, LinkedIn, and many other high-traffic social media platforms for advertising, we will be able to conduct large-scale advertising.

By using various advertising tactics such as Facebook ads, YouTube ads, Google ads, and email advertising, we will be able to rapidly increase our customer base.

We will also try to attract an audience by using social media applications and websites from different countries.

We have 170 social media accounts, and by simply running ads on these platforms, we can reach an audience of 300,000 people within a week.

We are able to announce our projects to 300,000 people in just one week.

What will your earnings be?

If you invest 200,000 US dollars in our holding company, you will receive your money back as 750,000 US dollars on December 30, 2026.

If you lend our holding company 200,000 US dollars, I will return your money as 750,000 US dollars on 30/12/2026.

You will lend our holding company 200,000 US dollars, and I will return your money as 750,000 US dollars on December 30, 2026.

If you invest 200,000 US dollars in our holding company, you will receive your money back as 750,000 US dollars on December 30, 2026.

I will return your money to you as 750,000 US dollars on December 30, 2026.

You will receive your 200,000 US dollars, which you lent to our holding company, back as 750,000 US dollars on December 30, 2026.

If you lend our holding company 200,000 US dollars, I will return your money as 750,000 US dollars on 30/12/2026.

Your investment of 200,000 US dollars in our holding company will be evaluated by our finance team, and I will return your money to you as 750,000 US dollars on December 30, 2026.

I will refund your money as 750,000 US dollars on 30/12/2026.

By investing 200,000 US dollars in our holding company, you will generate significant returns within a few months.

Thanks to our financial project, you will significantly multiply your money within a few months.

How can you contact us?

To learn how you can lend our holding company 200,000 US dollars, you can get detailed information by sending a message to the WhatsApp number, Telegram username, or Signal number below.

For detailed information, please send a message to the WhatsApp number, Telegram username, or Signal number below. I will provide you with detailed information.

To learn how you can increase your money by investing 200,000 US dollars in our holding company, send a message to the WhatsApp number, Telegram username, or Signal number below. I will provide you with detailed information.

To learn how you can invest 200,000 US dollars in our holding company and to get detailed information about our project, please send a message to the WhatsApp number, Telegram username, or Signal number below.

You can get detailed information by sending a message to the following WhatsApp number, Telegram username, or Signal number.

To learn how you can increase your money and get detailed information, send a message to our WhatsApp number, Telegram username, or Signal number below. We will provide you with detailed information.

My WhatsApp contact number:
+212 619-202847

my telegram username:
@adenholding

Signal contact number:
+447842572711

Signal username:
adenholding.88

Mostly evolved — started with the abandonment problem as the anchor and built backwards from there.

The first version had a more rigid flow: context prompt → generate draft → edit → send. But watching early testers use it showed the real blocking step is earlier than I assumed. The "what do I even write about this week" problem is upstream of the draft. So the flow shifted to lean harder into the setup phase — context scaffolding before generation ever starts.

Some things were fixed from day one (async-first, no requirement to be 'good at prompting', no blank page). But the specific sequencing came from watching where people got stuck.

Did you go through a similar process with whatever you're building, or did you find upfront definition actually held up?

Feels like most of these issues come from figuring things out while building instead of before.

Did you define your flow clearly upfront or did it evolve during development?

Same situation with a platform last year. AI SaaS, solo, zero budget. Reddit threads where your exact user was already venting gave better feedback than any launch page. For Scrivix that's probably r/newsletters or wherever newsletter creators are already complaining about their tools.

This is actually quite good-when you first look at it, maybe not so much, but-if people are coming back and re-using it, that is the only true signal this early on; most things like this, you use once and they are forgotten. ~

One thing I would be interested to monitor though is that saving time is good-it’s usually not enough of a pull. One thing in there felt more compelling, when users are saying that they want to write again.

If I were you, I’d lean into that one more-like-not quite so much "research tool" and more "thing that helps you just stay consistent without overthinking it."

And also, I would avoid expanding too rapidly right now; things like this very easily become a suite of features rather than a really tight focused thing for one kind of user. Getting three people that use it every week religiously is way more powerful than building features for it.

Honestly, though, this is where I would want to be at this stage.

I have the same problem and excellent product but I can't find testers, they say yes and then just disappear some of them it's avoiding me, why they yes!!! And a product with a few visits and growing really slow but let me tell when a saw a fist revenue OMG was such a rush. So let's keep going just that, keep doing what you doing and the results will be soon.

The spreadsheet-first approach before building is the part most people skip — and it shows in the quality of what you built. 100% retention after 6 weeks with 3 users is a real signal, not just a vanity number.
I'm in a similar phase with Autoreport (Stripe analytics by email every Monday) — also solo, also €0 budget, also learning that the first few users teach you more than any amount of traffic.
One thing that's helped me: the "6-9 hours/week" framing you discovered is already a conversion argument. That's exactly the number that justifies €29/month when you put it side by side. €29 vs 6 hours of your time is almost a no-brainer for anyone who values their time.
Happy to swap notes on early validation if useful. What's your current acquisition channel for the 5 beta testers?

Really like how you validated before building — that 5h → 45min result is a strong signal. I’ve seen the same problem with consistency, if you nail custom sources + tone control, this could stick long-term.

The positioning is sharp. “We’re not a publishing platform, we’re what happens before publishing.” That’s a clear line that Substack and Beehiiv can’t easily cross because their whole product is built around the sending side. Your ranking algorithm is both your biggest challenge and your biggest moat, like Forze said.

The dropout data is the strongest part of this whole post - 12 started, 3 still active by january. That's not a motivation problem, That's a time problem, and you identified it before building which is the right order.

The 5 hours to 45 minutes signal from friend A is the number you should put everywhere. That's a before and after that anyone running a newsletter understands immediately.

One thing worth thinking through - the 70% accuracy on AI suggestions is honest but it might be the thing that kills retention at scale. Friends tolerate rough edges, strangers don't.

what does the 30% failure look like - wrong tone, wrong sources, wrong angle? knowing which failure mode is most common tells you exactly what to fix first.

This sounds like a solid idea, especially with how fast AI content is growing. I’d be interested in testing it out and giving feedback. What makes your platform different from existing newsletter tools?

Really appreciate you sharing the whole process here, not just the "here's my product, please test it" pitch. The spreadsheet tracking why people abandon newsletters is a clever low-tech way to find signal before writing a single line of code — that's the kind of research that actually holds up.

The retention stat (100% over 6 weeks) is genuinely interesting, even with a tiny sample. With 3 users you can't read too much into it statistically, but the qualitative feedback tells a real story. "I was about to pause my newsletter. This makes it fun again." That's the kind of thing you can't fake.

One thing I'd push on: you mentioned the ranking algorithm was the biggest technical challenge. That's probably also your biggest moat if you nail it. Every AI writing tool can draft content — but surfacing the right sources, tuned to a specific creator's niche and voice, is much harder to copy. Worth doubling down there.

On the B2B vs consumer question — have any of the 4 agencies you talked to during research followed up since you launched? Agencies tend to have more predictable churn and higher willingness to pay, which could make that path more capital-efficient even if it's slower to acquire. Just something to weigh.

Good luck with the beta. The €29 price point feels right for early adopters — low enough not to be a blocker, high enough to signal you're serious.

Nice, early stage here too 🙌

Out of curiosity — how are you planning to handle support / user messages as people start testing?

I’m starting to get a few and it already feels messy between emails and random feedback. Trying to keep it simple without using heavy tools.

Scrivix looks like a lifesaver—that '6-9 hours a week' wall is exactly why most newsletters die!

Since you’re looking for validation right now, you should definitely check out the Validation Arena.
It’s a $19 challenge where founders compete to get their first paid customers. The winner gets a trip to Tokyo. >
It’s a great way to see if people will actually pay that €29/month before you spend more time on it. Plus, the prize pool just opened at $0, so the odds are huge

Dropping the discussion prompts here to get the conversation going:

1. Have you run a newsletter and hit the "I don't have 6 hours this week" wall? What did you do — push through, hire, or pause?

2. What would actually make you trust an AI tool with something as personal as your newsletter voice? For me the key signal was whether the suggestions felt curated or just scraped — there's a big difference.

3. The €29/month vs. €1000+ freelancer comparison feels obvious on paper, but in practice most people don't make that comparison consciously. What's the real decision you're making when you choose DIY vs. tool vs. outsource?

Genuinely curious — especially from anyone who's tried to monetize a newsletter audience. Is the time savings argument enough, or do you need something more to justify paying for tooling?