Six months ago I started talking to founders trying to tokenize real world assets. Every single one had the same story. Before writing a single line of code or onboarding a single investor, they had already spent between $15,000 and $30,000 in legal fees just to get a structuring opinion. Which entity to use. Which jurisdiction. Which licenses to apply for. Basic questions with largely mappable answers.
So I started building the RWA Structuring Engine. The idea is simple. You input your asset class, your target investors, your distribution model and your preferred jurisdictions. The AI generates a full structuring report covering entity selection (SPV, RAIF, VCC), regulatory pathway (MiCA, MAS, ADGM), token classification and required documentation. Not a chatbot. An actual structured output you can bring to a lawyer to execute, not to explore.
The business model is straightforward. A one-time report for founders in early diligence, and a subscription tier for funds and platforms that structure multiple assets per year. No fluff, no retainer, just a precise deliverable at a fraction of the cost.
I am now at the stage where I need to validate pricing and positioning with real users. If you have ever touched RWA issuance, tokenization or crypto regulatory structuring, I would genuinely love 10 minutes of your time. Drop a comment or DM me and I will send you the feedback form.
What would make you trust an AI output enough to act on it in a legal context? That is the question keeping me up at night.