A few months in, focused on the CV screening and job description flow first. The bet: recruiters don't want AI replacing judgment, they want the repetitive 80% off their plate so the last 20%, actually talking to people, gets more time.
Not open yet, still validating interest. There's a signup on the site if you want to be one of the first to try it.
I'm curious what convinced you recruiters want AI to stop at screening rather than participate further in the hiring process.
Was that a conclusion you reached from talking to recruiters, or a product principle you decided to build around from the start?
Yeah, it was more of a hunch than something I'd actually validated across a bunch of recruiters. Comes partly from my own time in HR: screening was the part I genuinely wanted off my plate, going through the pile, filtering out the obvious no's. But once you're at interviews and final calls, I wanted that judgment call to be mine, not something a tool decides for me. That's basically where the product boundary came from.
Fair point though, it's one person's experience, not a pattern. Worth actually checking with more recruiters before I treat it as fixed.
Appreciate the context.
Would be good to continue the conversation as you explore how recruiters respond to that boundary.
What's the best email to reach you on?
Thanks for the feedback and the interest, really appreciate it.
You can contact me via the project email, as I can’t post links here yet.
Thanks, appreciate it.
I couldn't find the project email. Could you share it here or point me to where I can reach you?
Thanks!
info@partgumanally.c om, please remove the space between the ‘c’ and the ‘o’
thank you :)
Thanks! I’ve just sent it over.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts whenever you have a chance.