2
2 Comments

Building was easy. Getting users is the hard part.

After months of building, I learned that getting users is 10x harder than building the product.

I built LeadRetain, a SaaS that helps businesses automatically follow up with leads who stop replying. I thought the biggest challenge would be coding.

I was wrong.

Building was the easy part.

Now I'm spending most of my time:

  • Posting on social media

  • Reaching out to potential users

  • Listing on directories

  • Creating videos

  • Improving SEO

  • Talking to founders and sales teams

One lesson I've learned: solving a real problem isn't enough. People also need to feel the pain urgently enough to change their current workflow.

For those who have already reached product-market fit:

What was the turning point?

Was it one marketing channel, one feature, one customer, or simply persistence?

I'd love to hear your experience. Every lesson helps.

posted toAvatar for product LeadRetain
LeadRetain
  1. 1

    "Solving a real problem isn't enough — people

    need to feel the pain urgently enough to change

    their current workflow" is the line that's

    actually reframing how I think about my own

    outreach right now.

    I built an AI appointment booking system —

    technically works well, real user, real

    testimonial. But cold outreach to strangers

    has been almost silent for weeks, while the one

    person who actually used it only did because he

    personally knows me and I asked directly.

    That's made me start wondering if the actual

    unlock isn't marketing volume at all, but finding

    people who are already mid-frustration with the

    exact problem — not just people who theoretically

    have it. Someone who just missed a booking and is

    annoyed right now versus someone who's been

    losing bookings quietly for months and adapted

    to it.

    LeadRetain is interesting because "leads who stop

    replying" is a very specific, already-felt pain —

    not a vague inefficiency. Curious if you've found

    that specificity in your positioning was what

    finally moved people, or if it was more about

    finding the right channel where people are

    already venting about that exact problem?

    Following this thread closely since I'm

    figuring out the same thing in real time.

  2. 1

    One thing I've noticed is that "getting users" is often treated as a marketing problem when it's actually a positioning problem.

    If people understand the problem but don't change their workflow, it's usually because the perceived cost of staying the same is still lower than the cost of switching. Finding and communicating that inflection point tends to matter more than adding another acquisition channel.