2
4 Comments

Building was the easy part. Getting people to change a 2-second habit is harder.

I launched TermsGuard to simplify contracts and privacy policies, making them understandable in plain English. The tool includes features like summaries, risk flags, a Q&A section, and PDF export.

However, I’m discovering that the key issue isn’t about having the right features. Despite the clear need, most people don't actually read the terms they're agreeing to. The discomfort of that moment is fleeting, only lasting a few seconds when they click the “I Agree” checkbox before moving on.

Now I'm faced with a question: Is the pain significant enough at that moment to motivate someone to change their behavior?

I’m looking for honest feedback rather than just encouragement. If you've launched a product where the problem was clear but the user behavior was difficult to shift, I’d love to hear your experiences:

  • What encouraged users to try it out initially?
  • What brought them back for more?

You can check out the product here: https://nexusdocs.ai.

on August 15, 2026
  1. 1

    The “2-second habit” framing makes the adoption problem very clear. Curious whether anyone has actually changed their behavior after using TermsGuard once.

    1. 1

      Aryan_sinh, I would be really interested in what you really think of the results from the APP. It uses RAG, and it focuses on Legal documents to provide a summary, Privacy and risks, and highlight keywords in the agreement. It's free, and I built it with privacy in mind, so nothing is cached. The free tier supports smaller agreements, but I'm more interested in the response you get and your thoughts. Then ask it any question: "What happens if my data is hacked"? Then export it to a PDF. If you have the time, I would really appreciate it. Go to nexusdocs.ai, click Get Started in the top right, then click Start Free, and log in with your Google or X account. It takes you to the app.

    2. 1

      This is a very good question, and at this point it's hard to measure cleanly while the product is still early — but there are some useful qualitative signals.

      The strongest feedback isn’t “cool summary.” It’s closer to:
      “I finally understand what rights I’m giving up / who owns the work / whether they can claim my data.”

      One recent review said they mainly wanted a plain-English read of what they do and don’t control when using a service — especially ownership and data terms. That’s decision support, not curiosity.

      Have people changed behavior after one use? I can’t claim a clean conversion study yet. What I can say is:
      -some users come back with a second real document

      • the questions get more specific after the first run
      • the moments that feel “real” are usually documents with something at stake (work ownership, cancellation, data rights), not random ToS browsing

      So the early evidence is more “this clarified a decision” than “this fixed the 2-second habit for everyone.” Still early, but that direction looks promising.

      You can read the reviews I got on SaaShub.
      https://www.saashub.com/nexusdocs-ai

      Thank you for your reply. Like others, I'm interested in what people have to say because this affects everyone. Even myself.

      1. 1

        That’s a useful signal — repeated unanswered questions being treated as content gaps is much more interesting than answer rate alone. I’d be interested in continuing the conversation. If you’re open to it, what’s the best email to reach you at?