14
54 Comments

Built a dead-simple pipeline tracker after losing a deal because I forgot to follow up

A few months ago I lost a deal I should have closed.

Not because of price. Not because of a competitor. Because I forgot to follow up for three weeks.

The prospect had moved on by the time I remembered.

I was managing my pipeline in Notion. Color-coded, custom formulas, looked great. But it never reminded me of anything. I had to remember to check it — and I didn't.

So I built CloserKit.

It's a dead-simple pipeline tracker built specifically for independent reps managing their own book of business — insurance agents, 1099 commission reps, freelance consultants, real estate agents.

What it does:

  • Kanban board — see every deal at a glance
  • Follow-up reminders — you set a date, you get an email at 9am that morning
  • Weighted pipeline value — know what's actually likely to close
  • Won/Lost tracking with reason logging
  • Works on mobile

No team features. No onboarding call. No HubSpot complexity.

Free plan (10 deals) + Pro at $9/month.

👉 closerkit.app

One ask:

If you know any independent reps, insurance agents, or freelance sales consultants who are still managing their pipeline in a spreadsheet — I'd love an intro or a share.

That's my exact user, and a warm referral is worth everything at this stage.

Happy to return the favor any way I can. 🙏

posted to Icon for group Sales
Sales
on June 17, 2026
  1. 1

    The pain is real. I lost a client once simply because I followed up three days too late — they had already signed with someone else.

    What surprised me building in the SMB space: the problem is almost never the tool, it is the habit. Most small business owners track deals in their head or a Notes app and feel too busy to change. The tool that wins is the one that fits into a workflow they already have, not the one that asks them to build a new one.

    Did you find adoption was easier when you made it simpler (fewer fields, less setup), or was it more about integrating with whatever email/calendar they were already using?

  2. 1

    The "lost it because I forgot to follow up" deal is the most common loss in sales and the most fixable, so you picked a real wound. I ran a sales-led services business for almost two decades and the pattern never changed: the rep doesn't lose on price or product, they lose on silence. Notion and most CRMs are passive, they wait for you to check them. The product that wins is the one that interrupts you, so your 9am email is the actual feature, not the kanban. One suggestion: pick one rep type and own it before going broad. "Pipeline tracker for independent insurance agents" will out-sell "for all independent reps" every time, because the first one sounds built for them. And lean hard into the Won/Lost reason logging, most reps never do it, and it is the one thing that tells them which deals to stop chasing.

  3. 2

    Great idea! Losing deals due to missed follow-ups is a common problem, and CloserKit's simple approach—pipeline tracking, reminders, and deal visibility—fills a real need for independent sales professionals.

    Simple tools often win because they solve one problem well, just like businesses such as Bedsheet.com.pk focus on delivering a straightforward customer experience.

    1. 1

      Exactly — one problem, solved well. That's the whole bet with CloserKit. Thanks for the kind words!

  4. 2

    Great insight. A tool that waits to be checked is just decoration.

    I’ve lost count of how many 'perfect' systems I’ve abandoned because they required me to remember them. That 'pull to push' inversion is the secret sauce for solo founder tools. It’s why I’m obsessed with building frictionless, local-first apps now - if its not in the user's immediate workflow (like an email or a native hotkey), it doesn't get used. Excited to see where CloserKit goes!

    1. 1

      "A tool that waits to be checked is just decoration" — that's the most accurate description of why I built this. The email reminder isn't a feature, it's the whole product philosophy. Would love to hear more about the local-first approach you're working on.

  5. 2

    That Notion detail — 'looked great but never reminded me of anything' — is the whole post. Mechanically you didn't build a prettier pipeline; you flipped it from pull to push. The deal tracker now reaches out to you instead of waiting to be opened, and that single inversion is why it works where the pretty board didn't.

    I hit the same wall on the notes side, building a small Captio-style memo app solo: a gorgeous vault I had to remember to open is just decoration. What fixed it was making each capture auto-append to my Obsidian daily note in the background, so recall never depends on my memory or my discipline. Any tool that waits to be checked quietly fails the exact people who are too busy to check it.

    1. 1

      You nailed it better than I did. "Flipped from pull to push" is exactly it — and your Obsidian example is the same insight applied to notes. The people who most need these tools are the ones too busy to remember to open them. That's the whole problem.

  6. 2

    Isn't it too hard to compete?

    1. 1

      Fair question. The CRM space is crowded at the top — Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive. But none of them are built for someone who works alone on commission with no IT support and no time to configure workflows. That's a real gap, and it's who I'm building for.

  7. 2

    his hits close to home, I even considered building something like this myself. feel like I've definitely lost jobs just from slow follow up. the notion pipeline looks great until you realize nothing's actually reminding you to do anything. going to check this out

    1. 1

      Appreciate it — would love to hear what you think after you check it out. Honest feedback always welcome.

  8. 2

    Love this, and "it never reminded me of anything" is the whole problem with the Notion approach. Funny thing: those same reps (insurance agents especially) have a leak one step earlier too. The deal you forget to follow up on is one thing, but the lead you never even logged because you didn't pick up the call is the silent killer. I build voice/WhatsApp AI for exactly that crowd, so the call gets answered and the lead captured. Your tracker + something catching the inbound = the rep finally stops dropping deals on both ends. Same exact user, different leak.

    1. 1

      Sharp point — the missed inbound is a real leak too. Different problem, same user. Makes sense you'd tackle that end of it.

  9. 2

    This is super relatable. Forgetting follow-ups is probably one of the most expensive 'small mistakes' in sales.

    1. 1

      Exactly — and the frustrating part is it rarely shows up as a "sales problem." It just looks like the deal went quiet, and you never know what you lost.

  10. 2

    The "I had to remember to check it, and I didn't" line is the part that stuck with me. Same pattern killed a lot of my best ideas before I built anything. I'd have a thought, but the friction of opening an app, finding the right spot and typing meant half of them just evaporated. The gap between the idea and the text field is where most of my solo founder momentum died. That's part of why I built DictaFlow: hold a hotkey, speak, release, and the text is already at your cursor. No remembering to open anything. If deals die between the call and the CRM notes, a lot of solo founder ideas die between the thought and the text field.

    1. 1

      That's a sharp parallel — the gap between thought and text field is brutal for solo builders too. Appreciate you sharing DictaFlow, sounds like a real problem you're solving.

  11. 2

    Losing a deal simply because a passive dashboard didn't remind you to move is a brutal lesson, but building the exact antidote is the ultimate founder pivot. Independent reps don't need a massive CRM database to manage; they just need a system that stops things from slipping through the cracks. Love the hyper-focus on simplicity here.

    1. 1

      Thanks — that's exactly the bet. Independent reps don't need more database, they need fewer things to remember.

  12. 2

    The detail that jumps out: Notion "looked great but never reminded me of anything." That's the real product — you didn't build a prettier pipeline, you built one that acts without being opened. I learned that the hard way on a tiny solo app: anything that waits for the user to remember is already lost.

    Which is also why I'd reframe the $9. Independent reps think in commissions, not subscriptions — one recovered follow-up pays for years. "$9/mo" sits them next to every other SaaS line item; "never lose a deal to silence again" sits them next to the deal they just lost. Have you tested leading with the cost of a missed follow-up instead of the monthly price?

    1. 1

      Haven't tested that framing yet, but you're right that it's probably stronger. "$9/mo" competes with every other subscription in their head. "The deal you just lost was worth more than a year of this" competes with nothing. Going to try leading with the cost of the miss instead of the price tag — appreciate the nudge.

  13. 2

    This is one of those problems that sounds small until it costs you a real deal.

    I've noticed that many founders spend time optimizing dashboards, CRMs, and reports, but the most valuable feature is often the simplest one: a reminder at the right time.

    A surprising number of sales opportunities are lost because of broken follow-up processes, not because the product or offer wasn't good enough.

    1. 1

      Exactly — and it's the kind of loss that never shows up in a postmortem as "we had a follow-up problem." It just shows up as "the client went quiet."

  14. 2

    Really relate to this — I lost a deal the same way, just got buried and remembered too late. What's worked for me since is pushing it one step past reminders into actual auto follow-up: the lead drops into a short sequence (day 0, day 1, day 3) that sends itself, and it stops the moment they reply or book. Reminders still rely on me to act; this acts even on the weeks I'm slammed. A tracker like yours plus that on top would be a killer combo for solo reps. Nice build 👏

    1. 1

      That's a sharp idea, and honestly the gap you're describing is real — reminders still need me to act, sequences act without me. Not on the roadmap yet, but I'm taking notes. If I build it, I'll make sure it doesn't turn into the "automation that feels like a stranger emailing your client," which is the failure mode I'd want to avoid.

  15. 2

    That's a very relatable problem. Curious how you're differentiating from existing CRM tools?

    1. 1

      Honestly, the biggest difference is what I leave out. Most CRMs try to be the system of record for everything — contacts, deals, reports, automations. CloserKit only does two things: a simple pipeline and follow-up reminders. No team features, no setup wizard, no dashboard you have to learn. If you're solo, that's usually all you actually need.

  16. 2

    losing a deal because of a follow-up gap rather than price or competition is the most painful kind — completely preventable in hindsight.
    the insight about Notion looking great but never reminding you of anything is exactly the problem with building systems in tools that weren't designed for that specific workflow. beautiful but passive.
    the "no team features, no onboarding call" positioning is smart for your audience — independent reps don't want to learn software, they want to close deals.

    1. 1

      Appreciate this — "beautiful but passive" is a perfect way to put it. That's exactly the gap I was trying to close.

  17. 2

    The Notion line is the whole thing. Anything you have to remember to open will eventually lose you a deal, so the only tracker worth building is one that interrupts you on the day you'd otherwise forget. A pipeline that waits to be checked is just a prettier version of the Notion board that already failed you.

    1. 1

      Exactly. A pipeline that waits to be checked is just procrastination with better UI. The interrupt has to be the whole point, not a nice-to-have.

  18. 2

    the no team features positioning is interesting because it's also a growth ceiling. independent reps who grow eventually hire assistants or join small teams and at that point the tool stops working for them. curious whether you're intentionally staying single-user forever or whether there's a point at which small team features become the natural next thing. the answer changes the product roadmap and the pricing ceiling significantly

    1. 1

      Good question, and honestly I haven't fully decided. Right now I'm staying intentionally single-user — most of the people I'm talking to are reps who left a team CRM because it was overkill, not reps trying to build one. If small-team features become a real, recurring ask once I have more users, I'd treat it as a separate tier rather than bloating the core product. But for now, solo-first is the bet.

  19. 2

    The "I had to remember to check it, and I didn't" line probably resonates with a lot of solo founders. What's been the most surprising feedback from users so far?

    1. 2

      Honestly, the most surprising thing has been how many people don't lose deals from forgetting a prospect exists — they lose them because the follow-up that mattered got buried under whatever felt urgent that week. I expected "I forgot" to be the main story. Turns out it's more "I remembered, but too late."

  20. 2

    The "it never reminded me of anything" line is the whole thing. I run service businesses and watched the same leak — a pretty pipeline you have to remember to check is just a spreadsheet with extra steps. The deals don't die from bad tracking, they die from silence between touches. Building the reminder in at the deal level (not the dashboard level) is the right call. Pulling won/lost reason logging in early is smart too — that's the data most reps never capture, and it's where the real pattern lives. Nice build.

    1. 1

      Yeah, that's exactly it — silence between touches, not bad tracking. That's why I built reminders at the deal level instead of a dashboard you have to remember to check. Curious how you're handling it in your service business right now — spreadsheet + manual checks, or something else?

  21. 2

    The interesting part is that most founders don't lose deals because they forgot the prospect existed.

    They lose deals because the follow-up that mattered got buried under everything else that felt urgent that week.

    I've noticed that as businesses grow, memory stops being a reliable system. What worked when there were 10 active conversations starts breaking when there are 100.

    Curious, was this a one-off deal that slipped or did you start noticing a pattern across multiple opportunities?

    1. 1

      Good question. It started as what felt like a one-off — forgot to follow up with a lead for two weeks. But once I started paying attention, I noticed it was a pattern, not an accident. The deals I lost weren't lost on sales skill, they were lost on silence. That's what pushed me to actually build something instead of just feeling bad about it.

      1. 2

        That's the part I find fascinating.
        When founders lose a deal, they usually look at pricing, positioning, or sales.But in a lot of cases, the real issue is that the opportunity slowly drifted out of view.
        Once you start noticing those moments, you realize they're rarely isolated incidents.
        Out of curiosity, did you try existing CRMs before building this, or did you feel they weren't solving the actual problem?

        1. 1

          I tried HubSpot first — set it up, imported some contacts, and then just... stopped opening it. Not because it was broken, but because it was built for a team workflow I didn't have. Every time I opened it I was greeted by features I'd never use. Eventually I just went back to a Notion board, which looked clean but never pushed me to do anything. The problem wasn't tracking — it was that nothing ever said "hey, this deal needs you today." That's the gap I built for.

          1. 2

            That makes a lot of sense.
            What I've noticed is that most CRMs assume the problem is organization. So they give you places to store information. But once things get busy, the challenge isn't where the information lives. It's knowing what actually deserves your attention today.
            The scary part is that a lot of opportunities don't disappear because they're lost. They disappear because nothing made them visible at the moment action was needed.Did building this change the way you think about growth itself, or just the way you manage communication?

            1. 1

              That's exactly the insight that drove the whole thing. "Organization" felt like the wrong frame — people aren't disorganized, they're just overwhelmed at the moment it matters.

              And yes, building it changed how I think about growth too. I used to think more pipeline = more deals. But the real leverage is in what's already there. Most reps have enough leads — they're just losing them to timing and silence.

              So now I think about growth less as "get more in" and more as "stop losing what you already have." That shift is actually what CloserKit is built around.

              What made you think about it from a growth angle — are you building something in this space too?

              1. 1

                Yeah, actually.

                I'm building FounderFlow around a similar observation, but from the founder side rather than the sales side.

                The thing that kept standing out to me was how many opportunities, customer conversations, and follow-ups were already inside the business. The challenge wasn't getting more information, it was recognizing what mattered before the moment passed.

                Interesting how we both seem to have started from different angles and arrived at a similar conclusion.

  22. 2

    The interesting part here isn't the follow-up reminder itself.

    It's what you assume the “system” should optimize for once a deal is already in motion — visibility, timing, or ownership of attention.

    Those can lead to very different product directions even with the same feature set.

    1. 1

      That's a sharp distinction. For me it leans toward ownership of attention — once a deal is in motion, the system's job isn't just "show me everything," it's "tell me what needs me right now." Visibility without that just becomes another dashboard you forget to check.

      1. 2

        That's the part I'd be careful with.

        Some decisions feel like feature decisions at first, then end up quietly defining the product.

        Hard to do justice to that in a comment thread.

        If you're interested, drop your email and I'll send over the fuller thought.

        1. 1

          Appreciate it, but happy to keep it in the thread if you don't mind — other founders reading this might find it useful too.

          1. 2

            That's fair.

            The reason I stopped short is that I don't think the interesting part is whether ownership of attention is right or wrong.

            I think it's the decision that follows from it.

            That's the part I'd be careful with.

            1. 1

              Fair point. I'll keep that in mind as the product direction firms up.

  23. 1

    Real pain creates real products.

    Missing a follow-up and losing a deal is something many freelancers, agents, and consultants have experienced.

    Curious to see how this evolves beyond traditional CRM tools.

  24. 1

    How is this possible

  25. 1

    Losing a deal because of a missed follow-up is a lesson many people learn the hard way. Building a simple pipeline tracker is often more effective than using complicated CRM systems because it keeps every lead visible and actionable. I’ve found that combining a straightforward tracking process with tools like truecaller mod apk can make it easier to stay on top of contacts, remember important conversations, and ensure that potential opportunities don’t slip through the cracks.

Trending on Indie Hackers
I got my first $159 in sales after realizing I was building in silence User Avatar 53 comments Three Days Before Launch, I Let My Own Tool Tear Me Apart User Avatar 37 comments I thought I was building a news visualization tool. Users thought it was a catch-up tool. User Avatar 32 comments I got tired of rewriting the same content for 9 different platforms. So I built Repostify. User Avatar 30 comments A pattern I keep seeing in EdTech: traffic isn't usually the problem. User Avatar 23 comments I Rejected a $15K Acquisition Offer for My Multi-Agent IDE — Here's the Full Breakdown User Avatar 19 comments