Built a first-pass AI video screening tool — looking for feedback on cautious report wording

I’m working on AI Video Detector, a web tool for people who see a suspicious social video and want a quick first-pass signal report before sharing it.

Link: https://aivideodetector.video/?utm_source=indiehackers&utm_medium=community&utm_campaign=launch_aivideodetector_video_202606&utm_content=build_feedback_post

The main product constraint is that this is a sensitive category. I don’t want the tool to overclaim that it can prove a video is real or fake. The report uses likelihood, confidence, source/media access, visual artifact, motion, compression, and audio-video consistency signals where available.

I’d appreciate feedback on:

1. Is the positioning clear enough for a non-technical user?
2. Does the wording avoid overclaiming?
3. What would you want to see before trusting a report enough to investigate further?