3
2 Comments

Built a no-code browser game engine where games live at their own URL. Stuck on free to paid conversion

I've spent over four years building Orbem Studio (orbem.studio), a browser game engine that runs entirely on the DOM with no canvas, no WebGL, and no external libraries. Every game lives at its own URL the moment you start building, no export, no upload, no separate host. The page is the game.

It's a full no-code visual builder. Top down and side scrolling movement, NPC dialogue and branching missions, inventory, combat with multiple enemy types, cutscenes, boss fights, gravity and platformer mechanics. There's also a built in pixel art tool so creators can draw sprites and place them directly into their game with a click, no switching apps.

A few games built with it: orbem.studio/games

The signup funnel at orbem.studio is finally working well. 10-15 signups a day from a cheap small Google search campaign, real engagement, people coming back across multiple sessions, even a few subscription popups triggering when users hit the game limit.
But zero paid conversions so far.

Free plan includes 1 game. Creator is $7/mo for 3 games. Pro is $19/mo unlimited. The popup hits when someone tries to create a second game.

I think the gap is that nobody has finished a game yet. Most users get partway through, add some assets, and stop. So the upgrade moment (wanting a second game) hasn't really arrived for most people organically.
Curious what this community thinks:

Does free-to-paid for a creative tool basically require users to "finish" the free experience first, or is there a way to create upgrade intent earlier?
Is $7 the right anchor price for this audience (hobbyist pixel artists, indie devs)?
Anyone done something similar with a creative/hobbyist tool? What actually moved the needle?

Happy to answer anything about the architecture too if anyone's curious how a game engine runs without canvas.

on June 15, 2026
  1. 1

    What makes this tricky is that several very different explanations can produce the exact same outcome.

    No paid conversions could mean users haven't reached the upgrade moment yet.

    It could also mean they're reaching it and deciding the value isn't clear enough to act.

    Those lead to very different product decisions, which is why I'd be hesitant to treat the current behavior as evidence for any one interpretation just yet.

    The interesting question isn't whether users are stopping.

    It's what conclusion actually deserves confidence from the fact that they're stopping.

  2. 1

    Honestly, the fact that you've spent 4+ years building this and got people coming back across multiple sessions is already a huge signal.

    My guess is the issue isn't pricing. Most users probably haven't experienced the full value of their first game yet, so paying to create a second one feels premature. I'd focus on getting more users to a playable/shareable game first.

    The retention sounds much more promising than the conversion rate right now.

Trending on Indie Hackers
6 weeks solo, 2 rejections, finally live but nobody told me marketing would be this hard User Avatar 138 comments Building ExpenseSpy solo, no funding — launching June 17 on iOS & Android User Avatar 59 comments I spent more time setting up cold email than actually selling. Here is what fixed it. User Avatar 32 comments I just wanted to taste AI coding tools. A week passed. User Avatar 21 comments I built a PDF API because every team I know has a haunted corner of their codebase they never want to open User Avatar 16 comments Building LinkCover – Day 3: Payment is live. No more building, time to sell. User Avatar 15 comments