2
2 Comments

Built NameProof: validating brand names before founders invest in branding

Hey IH đź‘‹

I've been working on NameProof — a tool that validates brand names globally before founders commit to domains, branding, or legal setup.

The problem I'm solving:

Most founders generate 20-30 names with AI (easy part).

Very few properly validate them before:

  • registering the domain
  • investing in branding
  • filing the LLC

And then discover too late:

  • the name sounds awkward in another language
  • trademark conflicts exist
  • social handles are taken

What NameProof does:

24h validation report covering:

  • pronunciation analysis (8+ languages)
  • domain availability (.com, .ai, .io)
  • social handles check
  • preliminary trademark screening

Current status:

  • Beta pricing: €9 (regular €19)
  • Just launched on Product Hunt today
  • Zero revenue yet (just went live)
  • Built with Make.com automation + AI

Questions for you:

  1. Does this solve a real pain point you've experienced?
  2. What would make you trust a tool like this enough to pay €19?
  3. Any red flags in the positioning?

Honest feedback > fake validation.

Links:

Thanks for reading 🙏

on February 14, 2026
  1. 1

    I am micro saas founder and from my perspective , I dont feel this as a big problem as for me if I solve atleast 100 to 200 people problem its good enough. But definietly for a bigger investment starup with a revolutionary idea or having a nice customer base and knowing their problem if some launches then it will matter to them the most .
    No hard feelings :)

    1. 1

      Appreciate the honest take

      You're right — this isn't for post-Series A startups with established brands.

      NameProof is specifically for solo founders and micro SaaS builders in the pre-launch phase.

      That moment when you're about to:

      • register the domain
      • file the LLC
      • invest in branding

      You mentioned solving for 100-200 people being "good enough" — I completely agree.

      That's exactly my target for the first 12 months.

      100-200 paying customers = sustainable micro SaaS.

      If you're building a revolutionary idea with VC backing, you'll have a branding team anyway.

      But if you're a solo founder validating fast and don't want to discover trademark conflicts 6 months later — that's the use case.

      Thanks for helping me clarify the positioning

  2. 1

    This comment was deleted 7 minutes ago.

Trending on Indie Hackers
I built a tool that turns CSV exports into shareable dashboards User Avatar 82 comments Why Indie Founders Fail: The Uncomfortable Truths Beyond "Build in Public" User Avatar 69 comments $0 to $10K MRR in 12 Months: 3 Things That Actually Moved the Needle for My Design Agency User Avatar 68 comments The “Open → Do → Close” rule changed how I build tools User Avatar 52 comments I got tired of "opaque" flight pricing →built anonymous group demand →1,000+ users User Avatar 42 comments A tweet about my AI dev tool hit 250K views. I didn't even have a product yet. User Avatar 42 comments