3
11 Comments

Choosing a Business Name...

Hey everyone, I am working on making a website that helps beginner/amateur developers build a website quick without compromising the quality. I will sell well-documented themes and give tips on how to boost their own site.

The website names I have narrowed it down to are:

BuildQuicker
BuildFastr
SoQuik
SoQwik
WebQwik

Tell me what you think I should go for or if you have another suggestion I would love to hear it. 😄👍

on April 26, 2020
  1. 2

    BuildQuicker is by far the best.

    • It's descriptive
    • It's impossible to spell wrong
    • It's memorable
    • It's generic enough to expand laterally (ie. build newsletters, etc)

    BuildFastr is my second choice. Still a great name.

    SoQuik, SoQwik, WebQwik are plain bad names. I wouldn't go with any of those. They're either too generic, don't sound ok, or force people to remember a lot (ie. have to remember that it's with "w" instead of "u" AND that with no "c").

    1. 1

      well said @typologist

    2. 1

      Thanks for the advice!

  2. 2

    Not sure your feelings on this. ppl google "Make a website" more than "build a website"
    quickerdev.co is available and so is: quickermaker.com

    https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?geo=US&q=make a website,build a website

    Also you can go a "funny" route: fastabettaquicka.com is available

  3. 2

    I like SoQuik :-)

    1. 1

      Hey @kylegawley, what do you think about "WebQwik" ?

      1. 1

        I think it looks and sounds a bit messy.

        1. 1

          I checked and SoQuik isn't available. Do you think SoQwik is a good alternative? (SoQwik is available)

          1. 1

            Yes, sounds good!

        2. 1

          This comment was deleted 6 years ago

  4. 1

    BuildQuicker 1000%
    Reminds me of GiveDirectly, PriceIntelligently, etc.
    Immediately recognizable, communicates value, easy to spell without being told how to, basic words, the list goes on.

  5. 2

    This comment was deleted 4 years ago

    1. 1

      Wow! Thanks for that idea @lucasleray !