James Layfield tackled a big problem by selling a manual process and replacing it with AI. Then, he took his new AI product and built it into a 7-figure ARR business.
Here's James on how he did it. đ
Iâve spent the last decade building companies that make complex systems simpler, from fintech innovation hubs to AI-driven platforms. My background is a mix of startups, corporate innovation, and just enough bureaucracy to know exactly what needs breaking.
Right now, Iâm working on Samplify.ai, which cuts through the chaos of enterprise software sprawl. Companies waste millions on overlapping tools and half-baked procurement processes. We built an AI that doesnât just tell you what software you own; it tells you what you actually need. Then it helps you consolidate â feature by feature, team by team â and transitions staff with zero fuss.
This isnât some theoretical problem. Companies are bleeding money because of software sprawl.
Weâre not chasing vanity metrics. Weâre here to save companies millions.
We didnât start with AI. We started with people. I spent months manually reviewing software exports for big companies, SAM tool dumps, spreadsheets, the usual mess. We figured out what overlapped, what could go, and what teams actually needed to keep. That process got results. So we automated it.
Samplify was never some abstract vision. It was built from doing the work ourselves, over and over, until we knew exactly what needed to be automated â and what didnât. No fluff. Just a system that delivers clarity fast.
Since automating it, we're built around OpenAIâs models, mainly GPT-4-turbo and GPT-4o. But honestly, the modelâs just the engine. The real value is in how we feed it and how we control it.
My cofounder used to build missile guidance systems, so precision matters to us. Weâve taken that same systems-thinking approach and applied it to AI. We donât just throw 200,000 words at a model and hope for the best. We use a structured framework that makes the model reliable in production. Think Monte Carlo-style agent chains, modular decision paths, and real-time context injection. Thatâs how you go from âcool demoâ to actual enterprise outcomes.
We use Python and LangChain, with some home-grown orchestration on top. Everything sits on top of a slim infrastructure â weâre not here to build a platform for the sake of it. Weâre here to deliver answers that cut spend and get CIOs promoted.
Most people treat LLMs like magic boxes. They throw in a wall of text, cross their fingers, and hope the output makes sense. Thatâs why so many AI pilots stall. Hallucinations, inconsistency... garbage-in garbage-out.
We donât do that.
We built a system around the model that enforces structure, context, and decision clarity. Itâs inspired by how missile systems are designedâevery component has a clear function, a fallback, and a chain of accountability.
Hereâs how it works:
Input is cleaned and pre-structured. No raw data dumps. We reduce noise, enforce timelines, and prep the model with exactly what it needs to reason properly.
Specialist agents handle distinct tasks. Each agent has a focused job, with only the tools it needs. This prevents bloated prompts and bad logic leaps.
Monte Carlo-style decision trees guide the reasoning. Instead of one monolithic guess, we walk the model through a controlled, branching path to get a stable, repeatable answer.
The full reasoning path is preserved. So we donât just get an output â we get the âwhyâ behind it. Thatâs critical for trust and explainability.
This lets us do what most people still canât: Ship AI that works the same on Tuesday as it did on Monday.
One of the most jaw-dropping moments came with Volkswagen Financial Services.
They gave us a mountain of data exports from their SAM tools, license spreadsheets, the usual mess. We ran it through Samplify and uncovered over $100 million in potential consolidation opportunities. Not theoretical savings, actual overlapping tools, unused features, and contract redundancies hiding in plain sight.
And the kicker? They had best-in-class tools already. They just werenât using them consistently. Different teams were paying for similar software to do the same jobs. Samplify cut through it all and showed them exactly what to keep, what to kill, and how to do it without losing functionality.
No giant transformation project. No months of workshops. Just clarityâand real, immediate impact. We then got referred to VW Cars!
The hardest part hasnât been the AI. Itâs been navigating enterprise inertia.
Weâre not solving a cool tech problem, weâre going up against years of political baggage, legacy vendor relationships, and risk-averse procurement teams. You can walk into a company and literally show them $30 million in software waste, and still get hit with, âWeâll review this next quarter.â Thatâs the fight.
What we had to learn was this: Outcomes alone arenât enough. You need timing, storytelling, internal champions, and a wedge.
Thatâs why we created our "$15k Proof of Concept". Itâs just enough money to get taken seriously, but not enough to trigger board-level drama. It puts skin in the game. We scoped it to deliver real results in 60 days, actionable insights, user-level transition plans, actual consolidation. No fluff.
It turned the conversation from âletâs talk again next quarterâ to âletâs get this live next week.â
If I were starting again, Iâd build that wedge sooner. Donât start with a platform. Start with the offer that unlocks the sale.
We didnât âattract users." We found the people with the biggest problem and solved it properly.
The $15k PoC helped a lot with growth. It gave buyers something they could actually say yes to. Itâs not a tool demo. It give us your data, and in 60 days, weâll show you what to cut, what to keep, and exactly how to do it without chaos.
Once that started working, word got around. People donât refer a dashboard. They refer the team that saved them seven figures without the usual drama.
Hereâs whatâs moved the needle most:
1. Enterprise buyers donât want more software. They want fewer decisions.
Once we stopped pitching âAIâ and started delivering certainty, the conversations shifted. CIOs donât want another dashboard. They want to know: What can I cut, what do I keep, and how do I not get fired for it. Samplify gives them those clear, defensible answers backed by logic, not opinions.
2. Running an AI-leveraged lean team is a massive advantage.
Weâre not a bloated startup with layers of PMs and weekly planning calls. Weâre a tight unit with AI doing the heavy lifting. Thatâs how we deliver custom outputs for Fortune 500 clients in days, not quarters. Itâs not just about speed. Itâs about staying close to the problem, iterating fast, and letting the machine handle the complexity while we stay focused on the outcome.
The result? Big company impact, small team agility. And a product that gets sharper every week.
As far as our model, we keep it simple. We charge to help companies cut waste.
It usually starts with a $15K Proof of Concept. If that lands, and it tends to, we move into a deeper engagement. Usually an annual contract.
Weâre now doing 7-figure ARR, all off the back of solving a real problem well. No funding. No sales team. Just a lean, AI-leveraged operation that gets results and keeps things moving.
Move quickly, or AI will eat your lunch. Leverage AI now before it does.
You can head to samplify.ai to see what weâre building, how it works, and why itâs different. If youâre inside a large company and drowning in software tools, or just want answers instead of another dashboard, weâre built for that.
As far as what's next, I want to start a school for a post-AI world. Like, how do we value time now, what is really important to us as humans? The world is changing so fast, and we are all getting swept along with new technology that will FOR SURE make all of us redundant. I want to solve that, how do we find true value in a post-work world.
So, ifyouâre thinking about what comes next in a post-AI world, Iâm exploring that too. Always happy to connect. Find me on Twitter and LinkedIn.
Leave a Comment
Really powerful case study! Samplifyâs journey from manual spreadsheets & old-school reviews into a structured, enterprise-grade AI system is exactly the kind of evolution I want for my app - this is a great inspiration. Doing the work yourself first, spotting the friction, then layering in structured orchestration and Claude (or whatever LLM) to automate what you understand deeply⌠thatâs how you avoid turning a good product into a brittle one.
What stood out to me was how they built frameworks around context, decision paths, and accountability (fallbacks, explainability) rather than dumping raw data into models and hoping. That mirrors what I learned the hard way: even with Claude in my stack, without context injection, real-validation layers, and a pipeline that demands consistent reasoning, you end up with agents producing âcool demosâ that fail when the scenario shifts.
Also, the $15K PoC wedge is brilliant. It gives enterprises enough trust without overpromising. If I were you, Iâd dig into how ScrumBuddy could support similar early validation mechanics - maybe generating mini-proofs of value internally, surfaced as lightweight dashboards or reports, so that before full investment, customers can see outcomes rather than promises.
Thanks for this, James. Stories like this help show that what scales isnât hype. Itâs structure, discipline, and solving real pain accurately.
One of the best breakdowns on IH Iâve seen. Thanks for sharing.
My favorite part (of several) was your explanation of the agent chain - specifically the observability of each step, fostering trust with the customer. Will be incorporating that going forward in my projects. Sounds like a great business youâre building, not just another wrapper. Keep up the good work!
Like how you started with a manual process - proves that real validation doesnât need to be fancy. Too many people skip that stage and build blindly.
Would like to hear more about what signals made you confident it was time to automate and scale.
Spot-on question. From my B2B growth teardowns, the clearest signal to automate is when you see consistent 30%+ repeat purchase patterns from manual delivery AND your support time per client plateaus. That proves you've nailed the core value before scaling. Automate too early and you're optimizing the wrong thing.
Makes sense that both retention (30%+ repeat use) and support plateau are the clearest markers that the process is stable and valuable.
When you hit that plateau, did you already have the pricing power to justify automation costs, or did you lean on future growth to make the math work?
I like the way you are approaching. This kind of SaaS products are worthy to use.
Absolutely nailed it. This is the kind of clarity the enterprise AI space desperately needs â not more dashboards, not more noise, but structured solutions that cut through chaos and actually deliver. The way you're approaching this â precision-driven, human-informed, and relentlessly outcome-focused â is what sets Samplify apart.
I especially appreciate the âno fluff, no vanity metricsâ mindset. Most teams chase traction. You chased truth. Starting manually, building from real pain, and only automating what proved valuable â thatâs rare, and it shows in the results.
Also: âPeople donât refer dashboardsâ might be the most honest line Iâve seen in a while. Totally stealing that.
Looking forward to seeing how Samplify evolves â and would love to hear more about the vision for a post-AI school. That kind of human-first thinking is exactly what we need next.
Awesome business and awesome story. I'd love to know how did you initially gain awareness and reach your first few businesses?
Hey James,
Thank you for the great article; it's very insightful.
By the way, I checked your website and found that the primary CTA on your homepage is not working.
Hey Thank You!!! I just sent a note to get that CTA working again. MUCH Appreciated!
Happy to help, James!
This is one of the most grounded and clear-headed takes Iâve seen on building real enterprise AI solutions. Love how you started with the messy, manual work first â thatâs where real insight lives. The focus on outcomes over optics, and the way youâve structured the system for reliability, not just "wow factor," really resonates. Also, the $15k PoC approach is genius â practical, low-friction, and actually drives change. Bookmarked and inspired â excited to watch Samplify grow.
Solid execution, James. Love how Samplify started with a manual process â that "do it yourself first" approach is such a powerful de-risking strategy. Turning a $15k PoC into a wedge for enterprise sales is brilliant. Itâs not just about proving value, itâs about making the buyerâs decision easy in a risk-averse environment. The missile-guidance-level precision in your AI orchestration (vs. throwing text at GPT) explains why this works in production when so many AI tools fail. Rare to see that systems-thinking in AI startups.
And James Layfield â incredible case study. Starting with human-delivered service before automating is the ultimate validation. Would love to do a growth teardown on Samplify. The transition from PoC to annual contracts at 7-figure ARR with no sales team is exactly the kind of lean, high-leverage model I help B2B founders scale. Would be fascinating to analyze your activation and referral loops â especially how you turn a $15k win into a seven-figure expansion (like with VW).
This really resonates. Iâve been guilty of trying to automate too early instead of proving the manual version first. Seeing you turn that into a seven-figure product is a good reminder that validation is worth more than speed. Do you feel the manual process also gave you deeper insight into what customers actually valued, compared to jumping straight into automation?
This story really resonated with me â a lot of successful AI products start exactly like this:
Manually validate a process
Identify where users feel the most friction
Automate the repetitive work with AI
Scale it into a real business
Weâve been exploring this too with AI Agents for Scalable Automation â essentially AI-driven systems that can take over repetitive workflows (data handling, scheduling, reporting, even customer interactions) and free up founders to focus on growth.
For founders, itâs often the same challenge: how do you go from scrappy manual MVP â automated system â scalable product without burning too much time? Thatâs why we started experimenting with Business AI OS - kind of like an AI operating system for automating operations across teams.
Curious to know â for those of you building in AI, what manual processes are you currently trying to automate?
This is gold. The best AI products Iâve seen (and the ones users actually stick with) usually start as brutally manual processes that solve a real, recurring pain.
We took a similar pathâstarted by manually helping engineering leaders map people to projects, track team health, and reduce busywork. The patterns were clear, and only then did we begin layering in AI to automate the repetitive parts.
Itâs easy to get excited by the tech, but this post is a great reminder: strong outcomes > fancy models. Appreciate you sharing the journey!
Really like how Samplify proves its value with a clear $15k PoC instead of another dashboard pitch. That wedge approach feels like the only way to move big enterprises fast. Curious â how often do these PoCs convert into long-term contracts?
great spirit , amazing idea , Deeply impressed by the idea of the app, simplify ai, actually I used this app , but today I know who is beside this amazing app.
I think this journey is especially helpful because it shows the power of starting small:
Begin with manual work to truly understand the problem and deliver real valueâeven if itâs just a Google Doc at first. That helps you discover what users actually want.
Use AI to automate later, once youâve proven the workflow worksâand shown it can scale to a real business.
Frame a simple offer (like a $15K proofâofâconcept) to make enterprise clients comfortable signing on.
đ A newbie question: How long did you run the manual process before switching to automation? Was it a gradual move or an all-at-once build? Curious because I'm working on a small AI tool too and want to follow a similar path.
Thanks for sharing such a grounded, actionable storyâthis helps demystify how real AI products are built.
Great timing question. In my experience with similar B2B plays, 3-6 months of manual delivery is the sweet spot - long enough to spot recurring pain points (like VW's $100M waste pattern), but short enough to avoid capping growth. The moment you're turning away clients due to capacity, that's your automation trigger.
Deeply impressed by your focus on addressing the problem itself, rather than getting caught up in the overhyped AI fad. Itâs challenging to decide when to use AI, when to avoid it, when to automate, and when to refrainâfiguring out what NOT to do is even harder. It feels like youâve been grappling with these questions every day.
Really interesting to see AI as the last step, not the first. The âdo things that donât scaleâ advice hits different when it turns into a 7-figure product. Makes me rethink how much I should be automating vs. learning from the mess first.....
Really insightful and very helpful to people with same ambitions
Love this mindset , starting with a repeatable manual process before automating it with AI is such a solid strategy.
Out of curiosity, how long did you run it manually before transitioning to a product? And was the switch gradual or all-in?
I'm working on small AI tools myself, so this was super motivating. Appreciate you sharing the journey!
interesting!
This is really interesting and inspiring, I have been ideating an AI product that help educate teams on problem solving process to ensure they understand the root cause of what they are trying to solve.
I like the idea of "starting with people" because its about helping people solve problem by showing them how or in my case educating them on processes. I believe everyone should have the education to identify the right problems and solve them.
Really inspiring read. I'm experimenting with something similar â using AI to help people turn their lyrics into full songs: Lyrics To Song AI. Still early, but the potential is exciting.
This is seriously one of the most honest and grounded breakdowns Iâve read about building a real AI product. No fluff, just systems thinking, clear outcomes, and smart positioning.
The part that hit hardest for me: âDonât start with a platform. Start with the offer that unlocks the sale.â That alone is worth gold.
Also appreciate how you framed LLMs not as magic boxes, but tools that need structure and context to deliver value. More people need to hear that.
Wow! And how much time did it take to complete?
Nice one... Thanks for sharing
The $100M+ saved for VW is a huge win, clearly shows the impact. Super insightful read, thanks for sharing the journey!
waw that was a super idea, it helps me about my own AI
Posts like this are why I enjoy Indie Hackers - nice one!
Wow, this was super insightful.
I loved how you broke down the shift from manual process to scalable AI product â especially starting with something as simple as a Google Doc.
Itâs a great reminder that solid products donât need to start fancy. Thanks for sharing your journey! đ
Initially things that don't scale is ok
Damn sharp. Love how you started manually, feels like most solid ops-driven products start that way. I built something similar (not AI-focused) by running a high-touch experience manually, then productizing it later. Totally agree on the importance of the wedge. The $15K PoC idea is clean. May steal that framing.
nice
This is a masterclass in enterprise strategy! The realization that buyers don't want more software, they want fewer decisions, is a brilliant insight. And the $15k Proof of Concept is the perfect wedge to bypass corporate inertia by selling a tangible outcome, not just a demo. Proves you need to BUILD the offer that unlocks the sale before you perfect the platform.
Awesome! Really practical app, lean team, and no meeting bloat. Love seeing stuff like this actually work.
This is one of the most grounded and practical AI startup writeups Iâve read. Especially resonated with your take on not chasing vanity metrics and starting with painful, manual work before layering on automation â we followed a similar path. Your "$15K wedge" idea is gold. Framing it as a de-risked, action-oriented PoC is something Iâm going to adapt immediately. Thanks for sharing such clear, battle-tested thinking â this is what real traction looks like.
Great write-up! I 100% agreeâreal enterprise AI impact comes from enforcing structure, not just scaling prompts or relying on âmagic boxâ LLMs.
Your Monte Carlo-style agent chains and context injection resonate a lot; Iâve spent the last few months testing different semantic reasoning frameworks to boost LLM accuracy and stability, especially in high-stakes or multilingual tasks.
Totally with you on the âno fluff, only real outcomesâ approach. Iâve found that once you enforce context boundaries and a structured reasoning path, hallucinations drop dramatically, and you get outputs you can actually defend in front of a boardroom (or, for my experiments, publish as open data). Alsoâremoving barriers like mandatory signups or data lock-in is underrated, but it massively accelerates adoption.
Love your proof-of-concept offer and the focus on genuine savingsâsometimes a lightweight toolkit or a âsemantic upgrade layerâ on top of standard LLMs can make a 7-figure difference, even without a big team.
Excited to see what you build next! đ
Iâve been building an AI ad generation tool, and your $15k PoC insight hit hard. Most founders I know start with features, not the offer that unlocks enterprise trust. This gave me a real framework to think from. I appreciate the insight!
The part about when building for enterprise clients wanting to make fewer decisions, really resonated with me!
cool stuff!
Awesome updates, thanks!
Thanks for the article, I just Loved this in the article "We didnât âattract users." We found the people with the biggest problem and solved it properly."
wow impressive
Thanks for your article. This is one of the cleared takes at later
This is one of the most honest, no-fluff build stories Iâve read in a long time. The focus on real enterprise problems (not vanity AI demos), plus the â$15K PoCâ wedge, is absolute gold. Too many folks chase platform dreams before proving their value. You didnât.
Also love how you started manually âthings that donât scaleâ and then layered in AI with real systems thinking. Thatâs how lasting tools are built.
Bookmarked this as a playbook for building lean, powerful products that solve painful problems. Respect.
This was super insightful. One thing that really stood out to me is how James didnât start with fancy AI models â he started by doing the hard, manual work himself. That helped him understand the real problem deeply before building anything.
Also, I love how they kept the business model simple: solve one painful problem really well, offer a small but serious $15k proof of concept, and let the results speak for themselves.
Another big takeaway for me is that itâs not about building flashy tools or dashboards â itâs about giving real answers that save companies money and time. People refer outcomes, not features.
Iâm learning that to build something valuable, you donât need to scale fast or chase hype â just solve a real problem, test it manually, and only automate what works. Simple but powerful.
This is genuinely impressiveâlove how you built Samplify from real, messy enterprise pain rather than chasing trendy tech. Your point on AI as a tool rather than a magic box is spot-on. Also, huge respect for tackling enterprise inertia head-on with a practical, outcomes-driven approach. Rooting for your next chapter in the post-AI space!
Love how you're focusing on solving real problems with AI while staying lean â thatâs absolutely the future. In healthcare, especially around HIPAA compliance, weâre starting to see AI help manage privacy risks more proactively.
Iâm really curious to see how AI transforms traditional sectors in this post-work world. Appreciate you sharing your journey â super inspiring!
Love the focus on solving real problems with AI and keeping things lean â thatâs the future! In the healthcare space, especially around HIPAA compliance, AI is also starting to make a huge impact by helping organizations manage privacy risks more effectively. Excited to see how AI shapes all industries in this post-work world. Thanks for sharing your journey!
This is đĽ. Taking a manual workflow you know intimately and turning it into an AI product is exactly what Iâm working on right now â in my case, itâs for consultants drowning in slide work.
Curious how long it took you to go from âthis is painfulâ â âothers would pay for thisâ?
Grateful for you sharing this â insanely motivating.
Turning a manual process into a sevenâfigure AI product is pure hustle magicâbrutally smart and brilliantly profitable
Great article! Really impressed by your knowledge of AI tools.
If you have a moment, would you mind trying out a free AI tool Iâve been looking into? Itâs called accio. Iâm part of a small startup team with a limited budget, and Iâd love your opinion on whether itâs useful for people like us. Thanks in advance! đ
Thank you for sharing this inspiring journey. Your insights on transforming a manual process into a successful AI product are truly valuable and motivating for aspiring entrepreneurs and tech builders.
This article feels like it was too much written by AI, a lot of AI slop terms. Not sure if I'm crazy or many of the comments feels clearly botted as well
Enjoyed reading this insightful content. Really looking forward to more like this
This is a very grounded approach, I often advise that founders should consider starting services-first to get their first few customers and then make the transition to product after learning from nuanced patterns
Through services you can learn very directly about the problems of your customers and only with that learning can you create automation that is robust enough for the complex requirements of the real world
I have been working on similar problem but for a very specific technology vertical, mostly manual processes as of now. Your solution is interesting. How do you handle situations where different teams use different softwares for same outcome because of their past expertise or their specific customer needs. I struggle to solve this problem even when we can show clients that there is opportunity in consolidation.
Thank you for the great article.
Truly Inspiring!
Incredible work, James! Turning a manual process into an AI-powered solution and scaling it to 7-figure ARR is seriously impressive. Inspiring journey!
Awesome! Sounds like the future of how all companies should be
Awesome story
Incredible journey from manual effort to a 7-figure AI product! Truly inspiring how you identified a real problem, streamlined it and scaled with tech. Valuable insights for aspiring indie hackers.
This is gold. Love how it started with manual grunt work and turned into a real product that solves a painful, expensive problem. Also, that $15K PoC wedge? Brilliant way to cut through enterprise red tape. Real lessons for anyone building in the AI + B2B space.
Creating a manual process and turning it into a 7-figure AI product is more than just a growth story â it's a masterclass in identifying repeatable value and scaling it with tech.
Incredible journey! Turning a manual process into a 7-figure AI product is pure inspiration. Loved the clarity, execution and vision behind it. Truly motivating for all aspiring founders out there!
Jamesâ approach brilliantly shows that real impact comes from solving practical problems firstânot chasing flashy AI hype. Starting with manual work to deeply understand the pain points, then carefully automating with precision and accountability, is how you build trust and scale enterprise solutions. Truly inspiring!
I think your blog is a good site that anyone can use to learn something new. I value you and want you to check out my website
To turn a manual process into a 7-figure AI product, it is necessary to identify repetitive tasks, train AI models to automate them, validate market demand, and scale with efficient, value-driven solutions.
"Iâm building something similar in India!"
This was a brilliant read. Love how you started with a manual service before layering in AI real validation first, tech second. The $15k PoC model and your focus on precision over fluff are gold. Massive respect for how youâre cutting through enterprise noise and actually delivering results. đ
This was a brilliant read! Turning a manual process into a 7-figure AI product is inspiring and practical. Love the insights into validation and growth, super motivating for builders like me!
This is a systematic and complex product that solves real needs for B-side customers.
Incredible journey! Turning a manual process into a thriving AI product is both inspiring and insightful. I appreciate you sharing what it's like behind-the-scenes, it's a great read for anyone building from the ground up!
I noticed my husband was cheating on me and no longer committed to our marriage. When i asked him what the problem was he told me that he is not happy and he is asking for a divorce. It broke me into pieces because he was the only man i have ever been with. I was looking for something online when i saw an article how Dr Ilekhojie helped so many people in similar situation like mine, i contacted him immediately telling him about my problem.
He made consultations and performed a reconciliation ritual. All he asked of me, i did it out of complete trust for him and in exactly 3 days, my husband returned home from work and asked that i forget completely about the divorce and he wants us to put our minds together and make our marriage work. Everything went well because of the intervention of Dr Ilekhojie. Kindly make contact with him if you have problems in your marriage or relationship. Phone number/Whatsapp +2348147400259
Incredible
This is a masterclass in cutting through enterprise noise with real-world rigor.
What stands out most is the human-first approach before AI, months spent manually digging through messy data to understand the problem before automating it. So many try to start with tech and miss the nuance.
The precision mindset borrowed from missile guidance systems is a brilliant analogy. Treating AI like a disciplined system, not a black box, is exactly what separates hype from impact.
Also, the $15K Proof of Concept wedge is genius. Enterprise inertia isnât solved by big demos or endless pitches, itâs cracked by reducing risk and showing real, immediate value in a way that doesnât trigger internal politics.
Finally, your focus on delivering clarity over dashboards, and cutting waste instead of selling features, is the kind of no-BS product thinking that actually moves the needle.
For anyone struggling with enterprise AI adoption, this thread is a blueprint on how to really build in public and build for impact.
Would love to hear whatâs the hardest internal hurdle youâve faced getting enterprise buy-in?
This is one of the most grounded and actionable posts Iâve read in a while. Loved how you started by doing the manual work first â itâs such a crucial (and often skipped) step before building anything with AI.
The $15k PoC is brilliant. It hits that sweet spot between being a low-friction decision for enterprise buyers and still having real skin in the game. Also really appreciated this line:
People donât refer dashboards. They refer the team that saved them seven figures.
That alone says so much about how enterprise buying actually works. Curious â how long did it take you to refine the PoC into a repeatable sales asset?
Great article. Loved to read it.
Great mindset! Focusing on real impact over vanity metrics leads to meaningful growth.
Well done! 7 figures ARR is a real achievement. Manually doing a task is a great way to validate an idea before spending months on a polished software ghost town!
People don't refer dashboards' - this hit hard. We're so obsessed with building features that we forget to solve the actual bleeding. Solid execution
this is great! I would like to know more about the launch and how you got this in front of users, to get their feedback quickly
Is there any format you follow for posting, It's enagning, it's like my eyes are engaged to read whole article
Fantastic story, James! I love how you tackled a real problem and leveraged AI to make a significant impact. Your approach of starting with people, not just technology, is inspiring. The $15k proof of concept strategy is genius - it shows tangible results without the usual drama, making it hard for enterprise clients to say no. Keep up the great work and exciting to see your plans for a post-AI world!
Great read! I'm also interested in the optimization space, specifically optimisation with math tools. The insights about a specific value PoC and what specific answers to provide decision-makers were very valuable.
Great insight! Thanks for sharing. I'm building a nutrition tool myself â this was helpful.
This article does a great job showing how you can turn a simple manual process into a successful, high-value AI product.
Thank you
This was incredibly clear and helpful đ
Thank you
This is an excellent, in-depth breakdown of how to build AI solutions that truly deliver measurable business value. The focus on solving a real, costly problem before layering on tech is so crucial â especially in areas like compliance where clarity and trust are everything.
At CompliAssistant, weâre building an AI-powered compliance assistant specifically for SMBs to simplify GDPR, HIPAA, and SOC 2 requirementsâhelping teams reduce risk without the overhead of manual processes or costly consultants.
Reading about your lean, precision-driven approach to AI orchestration really resonates â itâs a great reminder that AIâs power lies in smart design and domain expertise, not just raw data or flashy demos.
Would love to connect and exchange insights on making AI solutions reliable and actionable at scale!
Drop me a line on linkedin
Thanks! Iâm not on LinkedIn at the moment, but would love to keep the conversation going. Feel free to drop me a line at [email protected] â happy to share insights and learn from each other.
This is such a sharp breakdown of what it actually takes to build something useful with AI - not just flashy demo, but real, operational impact. Especially resonating with 'don't start with a platform, start with the offer that unlocks the sale.' That clarity-first mindset is everything. I'm building something similar called HiVaulted, it's a platform for small business owners who want to offload their social media - and this was a great reminder to keep the business model tight and rooted in actual problems. Appreciate you sharing all of this.
Thank you Anne.
Just read your post, and manâit hit. Iâve been knee-deep in the AI trenches for a while. At CivitAI, I led a lot of the backend behind our multimodal pipeline (text, image, voice, all mashed together), scaled it for millions, plugged in LangChain, built a RAG search engine, tossed in CLIP and YOLOv5 for good measure⌠all the fun stuff.
But hereâs the thingâwhat really stuck with me wasnât the tech. It was watching users try to wrangle these tools like they were building IKEA furniture without a manual.
So hereâs my itch: what if we made something that strips out the friction from AI workflowsâlike, brutally simple. Not âyet another AI tool,â but a playground where anyoneâtechie or notâcan stack GPT, image generation, vector search, APIs, whatever, and get results instantly. Drag, drop, boomâworking pipeline.
Maybe itâs a personal AI factory. Maybe itâs AI Zapier. Maybe itâs totally something else. But it should feel fun, fast, and powerful.
Iâm not looking to raise or build a startup right now. I just want to build something cool and useful with the right hacker.
Anyone else feel that itch too?
Letâs jam.
This comment was deleted 4 months ago