Yesterday I said I’d share the exact rule I use to decide whether a keyword is worth writing about for a tiny product.
Here it is:
A keyword is worth writing only if it passes 3 filters:
Intent fit
Product fit
Ops fit
If one fails, I skip it.
Most founders lose time on SEO because they start writing before deciding if the keyword is even publish-worthy for their business.
For me, this 3-filter check is what keeps SEO lightweight and repeatable.
What does the searcher actually want right now?
I do a quick SERP scan and ask:
Are top results mostly guides, tools, comparisons, or definitions?
Is there one dominant intent, or is it mixed?
If intent is mixed or too vague, I skip.
Can I connect this topic to my product naturally?
If I can’t bridge the post to a real product action without forcing it, it’s not a good keyword for me.
No forced CTA. No “and by the way, buy my thing.”
Can I ship this reliably inside my normal week?
If it requires deep research, custom graphics, and a huge writing effort every time, it breaks the system.
I optimize for throughput:
publishable, useful, consistent.
I score each filter from 0 to 2.
5–6: write now
3–4: backlog
0–2: skip
This keeps decisions fast and removes guesswork.
This rule turns keyword selection into operations, not inspiration.
Instead of asking “Is this the perfect keyword?”
I ask “Can this keyword produce reliable output and useful business signal?”
That mindset alone changes everything.
I’m also running a promo for new users:
Use code IH26
50% off any plan for the first 3 months
Valid until March 19, 2026
Paid trial is still charged at full price: $9 (not discounted)
The goal is to give founders enough runway to measure real improvement in organic traffic with automated SEO content creation.
If you’re building in this space too: what’s harder for you right now, keyword qualification or publishing cadence?
This tool inspires me! Great stuff :)
Thank you for your kind words.