3
17 Comments

Day 35 of trying to get my first paying customer. Still at zero. Here is what the data is actually telling me.

I set a goal of paying customers in 40 days for Bersyn, a tool that shows you which products AI models recommend when buyers ask. I am on day 35. Paying customers: 0. I want to write the honest version, not the highlight reel.

What has not worked: cold email. I sent a batch of careful, personalized founder emails, each built on a real scan of that founder's own product. One reply so far. Not zero value, but not a channel that is going to find me a customer in the time I have.

What did something: content. I published a few teardowns showing exactly what AI says in a category. Within hours of one of them, a stranger left a sharp, expert comment on an older post of mine and we had the first real back and forth I have had in two weeks. It came off a public post where someone could reply, not off an email sitting in an inbox.

So the lesson I am taking into the back half: I do not have a conversion problem yet, I have a distribution problem. Nobody is bouncing off my pricing page. Almost nobody is arriving. Optimizing the funnel before there is traffic in it is just a comfortable way to avoid the scary part, which is putting the work in front of strangers and asking them to react.

The artifact from today, since this is build in public: I measured which hosting platforms the four major AI models recommend for a SaaS app. Railway got named in 0% of ChatGPT answers and 0% of Perplexity. Fly.io was missing on three of four models. Claude was the only one that knew the modern tools. The models mostly still send you to AWS and Heroku. That is the kind of thing my product exists to surface, and it is also just genuinely interesting, which is the whole point of a teardown.

If you have taken a B2B tool from zero to its first customers recently, I would take any honest answer to one question: what was the channel that actually produced the first paying person, not the one that produced the most vanity engagement.

on June 25, 2026
  1. 1

    Day 35 at zero is brutal but normal — the data usually says distribution channel mismatch, not "bad product."

    What channels have you actually tried consistently (not just posted once)? Curious what's in the numbers.

    1. 1

      yeah, that matches what i'm seeing. it is distribution, and more specifically it is that the people reading are not always the people with budget and real pain right now.

      channels i have actually run consistently (5+ weeks, not one-offs): dev.to teardowns where i scan a category and show which tools AI recommends vs ignores, cross-posted to reddit and HN, plus direct founder DMs. the content gets real reads and comments. what it has not produced yet is someone saying "that's me, take my money."

      the number that bugs me is decent top of funnel, near zero intent. so i am now pointing the content at specific named companies, the ones AI ignores, instead of a general audience, on the theory that the wound has to be personal before anyone pays. we will see if it closes the gap.

      what did distribution fit look like for you when it finally clicked?

      1. 1

        "reads and comments but nobody saying that's me, take my money" is the gap.

        Distribution hasn't fully "clicked" for me either — still validating. What shifted was stopping product-category posts and hunting threads where someone is already describing the pain in their words (Reddit especially). The fit signal is problem language, not audience size.

        Your named-company pivot makes sense if AI ignores them — different bet than community pain-hunting though.

        What's the product and which subs you're cross-posting to? Curious if the Reddit traffic is tire-kickers or ever gets close to intent.

        1. 1

          The product is Bersyn. it scans what ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity actually recommend in a category and shows a company who AI names instead of them. so the "named-company pivot" is just the product pointed at itself, i go to the companies AI ignores.
          On reddit i have mostly cross-posted to r/SaaS, and you are right that fit is problem language, not audience size, r/SaaS is too broad. honest answer on traffic: so far it is tire-kickers and other founders, not in-market buyers. that is why i am testing the named-company route. your problem-language hunting is probably the better engine for a horizontal product. which subs gave you the cleanest problem-language threads?

          1. 1

            Bersyn is a clear pitch — and yeah, r/SaaS is mostly founders talking to founders. Same pattern I see: reads, zero "take my money."

            Cleanest problem-language threads for me so far weren't the big subs — they were niche ones where the buyer actually vents:

            • r/InsuranceAgent / vertical subs (when product matches a specific job)
            • r/poker + r/poker_theory (hyper-specific pain)
            • r/SaaS works only when you search pain phrases ("Reddit marketing", "first customers", "shadowbanned") not product category

            For Bersyn I'd try r/marketing, r/SEO, r/bigseo, r/Entrepreneur with phrases like "ChatGPT recommends competitors", "AI search visibility", "not showing up in AI answers" — and skip broad r/SaaS for discovery.

            Want me to hand-build one scored sample for Bersyn? You send 3–5 pain phrases + subs, I'll pull threads where someone's describing that pain (1–10 + why matched). Free — takes ~24h.

            1. 1

              yeah, i'll take you up on that, thank you. genuinely generous offer.

              pain phrases, in the buyer's own words:

              • "chatgpt recommends my competitor instead of us"
              • "we don't show up when people ask ai for tool recommendations"
              • "ai doesn't even know my product exists"
              • "how do i get recommended / cited by chatgpt"
              • "ai keeps naming the same few tools every time"

              subs i'd point you at: r/SEO, r/bigseo, r/marketing, r/Entrepreneur, and r/SaaS but only on a pain search, not category. maybe r/digital_marketing too.

              and your earlier point landed, problem language over audience size is the better engine for this. i've been leaning too hard on category posts. what are you building the scoring into, a tool or still manual? happy to be a guinea pig and give you real feedback either way.

              1. 1

                Yes — I'll build it.

                ThreadScout (https://threadscout-theta.vercel.app/): daily scored threads where someone describes your pain in their own words (1–10 + why matched). Still early / validating, so yours is hand-built for now — not fully automated yet.

                On it for Bersyn with your phrases + subs. Feed link in ~24h. Work a few by hand and tell me if the pain language is real buyers or tire-kickers — that's the feedback I need.

                1. 1

                  Perfect, thank you, I appreciate you building it. I'll work the first batch the day it lands and tell you straight which threads are real in-market buyers vs other founders, and which phrases pulled the cleanest matches. That's the signal you want for ThreadScout, and the one I need too.

                  Turnabout is fair play, so two things I'd happily do for you, both free:

                  1. The buyer scan. I already ran ThreadScout's category through Bersyn. Asked the four models, three ways, how to find leads on Reddit. ThreadScout came up 0 of 12, they keep naming GummySearch, then F5Bot, Brand24, Brandwatch. Happy to send the full breakdown, that's the "who AI recommends" side.
                  2. A full website audit when you publish on your own domain (you're still on the Vercel URL, so I'm guessing pre-launch). It shows how the models actually read ThreadScout's site and the exact fixes so they place you correctly from day one. Being readable to AI from launch is a real head start.

                  Easiest to keep this going over email if you'd rather, I'm at [email protected]. Either way, send the feed when it's ready and tell me when ThreadScout ships so I can run the audit.

                  1. 1

                    Built your Bersyn sample — threads where someone describes AI visibility / GEO pain in their own words, scored 1–10 + draft reply each:

                    https://threadscout-theta.vercel.app/feed/6c291ce7-03f8-4b69-915a-38a934947cfd

                    Do any of these feel like in-market buyers vs founders talking to founders?

                    Still early / validating — free hand-build. If useful, happy to run another batch or tweak subs/phrases.

                    1. 1

                      siromi, this is genuinely useful, thank you for building it.

                      Straight answer on buyers vs founders: about 3 of the 10 read as real in-market. The "how can I check AI visibility for free" thread, the "what is the best AEO and GEO tool" thread, and the "clones are confusing LLMs and stealing my branded SEO" one. The first two are people actively shopping for a tool, the third is genuine first-person pain. Those three I would actually work.

                      The other seven are mostly founders and marketers talking to each other, and a couple are other builders running the same angle, so they are context, not buyers. The pattern that sorted them: a buyer either asks for a tool ("best X", "how do I check") or describes their own pain in the first person. A peer gives advice or shows off a method. If you weight toward those two shapes and down-weight opinion and how-to posts, the signal gets a lot cleaner. Right now everything is 10/10, so the number is not doing the sorting yet, the thread text is.

                      On phrases: "how do I get recommended or cited" and "we don't show up when people ask AI" pulled the cleanest. The broad "AI visibility" idea pulled the most noise, mostly r/digital_marketing practitioners trading takes. r/SEO and r/bigseo gave the sharpest single threads. One honest constraint on my end: those subs are strict no-promo, so they are value-comment plays, not places I can name Bersyn. That is fine, that is the game.

                      Yes to another batch when you want it. The sharpest cut would be "what tool should I use" requests plus brand-defense pain like the clones thread. And I still owe you the ThreadScout buyer-scan breakdown and the site audit when you ship on your own domain. Easiest over email, mine is [email protected], send me yours and I will fire both over.

  2. 1

    The distinction between a conversion problem and a distribution problem really stood out.

    It's easy to start tweaking pricing, onboarding, or the funnel because those are things we can control. But if almost nobody is seeing the product in the first place, those optimizations can become a very comfortable distraction from the harder work of earning attention.

    1. 1

      this is exactly the trap i caught myself in. i spent a week improving onboarding for a product almost nobody was reaching. it felt productive because it was measurable and fully in my control.

      the reframe that helped me: if 5 people see it and 0 convert, that is not a conversion rate, it is a sample size of 5. you cannot optimize your way out of not being seen. so the work right now is the unglamorous kind, earning attention from the exact people with the problem, and leaving the funnel alone until enough of them show up to tell me something real.

      are you in the build phase or the distribution phase right now?

      1. 1

        Happy to.

        What's the best email to reach you on? I think it'll be easier to explain the thought properly there.

        1. 1

          Yeah let's do it, easier over email. [email protected]. send me whatever you've got, i read everything and i am genuinely curious what you are seeing.

          1. 1

            Just sent it over.

            Curious to hear your thoughts once you've had a chance to read it.

            1. 1

              replied over email, thanks for taking the time to write it all out. appreciate it.

              1. 1

                Hey Gissur,

                I actually haven't received a reply from your side yet, so I just wanted to check—did my email make it through?

                No rush at all. Just wanted to make sure it didn't get lost somewhere.

Trending on Indie Hackers
I Was Picking the Wrong SaaS Tools for Two Years. Here's the Mistake I Finally Figured Out. User Avatar 120 comments Drop your landing page URL. I'll use Ferguson to tell you why visitors might be leaving User Avatar 101 comments I sold $6,773 in 2 weeks, with almost no existing community. User Avatar 39 comments Ferguson is LIVE on ProductHunt today... so I audited their homepage first! User Avatar 35 comments Why Remote Teams Stop Talking (And Don't Even Notice It) User Avatar 26 comments Built a local-first Amazon profit-by-SKU + QuickBooks/Xero journal tool. Looking for founding users. User Avatar 23 comments