There's a common theme among budding entrepreneurs. They think they need to solve a problem, and then find customers to sell their solution to that problem.
It's totally backwards. But, it's a very attractive line of thinking. Most people on Indiehackers are developers/technical, so they default to solving problems.
Engineers solve problems. Developers solve problems. Employees solve problems. And they get paid a salary to do so.
Entrepreneurs provide value. They help people. They create things that enable people the be better versions of themselves. And, they get paid based on the value they provide. Not the time they spend solving the problem.
If you want acknowledgement, and a salary wage, solve problems.
If you want to start a real business and make money, help people do what they were already doing more efficiently (faster, simpler, cheaper, etc.).
You can do both, but only one aligns with the demand of the market.
People know what they want to do. They know how they want to make money, be entertained, be productive. Your job as an entrepreneur is to help them do that better.
This ranges from the smallest apps, to the biggest companies in the world. You don't have to reinvent the wheel to get paid lots of money.
Think of Uber. It's a streamlined, network based taxi service. It's an iteration. It's helping people do what they were already doing (taking taxis) and making it more efficient.
Think of Google. People wanted to find the right information, faster. Libraries had been around for centuries. There's encyclopedias, and other reference texts that existed before the Internet. Google helps people get that information more efficiently.
You can rattle off any company. It's all the same. It's all iterative. There's no massive breakthrough in innovation that's not just a more efficient version of what people were already doing.
One could say the way these companies grow is novel, and innovative, and unique to this day and age. But successful products are helping people do what they've always done.
So, if you're struggling to come up with an idea or struggling to create something that people actually want to use, then you may want to adjust your thinking.
The reality is, people are already doing what they want to do. It's not up to you to change that. It's up to you to make that better.
@levidxyz I just stumbled across this excellent post on the front page now. I feel like I let you down with my explanation - hopefully Jordan's approach sits better with you :)
Thanks for the heads up. You’re right this is a great explanation.
This part I think is especially relevant to our conversation from the other thread.
To me this is saying that the switch from “solve their problem” to “improve their life” is indeed a semantic one but that switch in mindset/framing is crucial for creating a successful business.
Nice perspective to come up with new startup ideas!
Did you come up Closet Tools with this thinking? How was your ideation process?
Yeah I mean there really wasn’t an “ideation process”. I just built it because my wife and her friends were spending a lot of time selling on Poshmark. So I was just trying to help them do what they were already doing. Turns out a lot of other people had the same inefficiencies.
I don't have your edge unfortunately. Thanks for sharing anyway
This is a great perspective. I've been thinking too hard from the lense of "What problem I'm solving this? " but flipping it around thinking to "What value I'm generating with this?" is a far better way to look at it.
Thanks, Jordan
Wow I agree so much with this
A good way to think about fresh ideas for upcoming entrepreneurs.
Jordan, do you mind if I follow up with you, with a few questions?
Sure my email is in my profile
Cool. I saw that you have an open DM on Twitter.
So pinged you there :)
This article explains the “niche within a niche within a niche” projects. We’re trying so hard to reinvent the wheel, we just need to innovate better on existing projects (unless)
I don't really understand the post. Are you saying that we should try to slightly improve the existing solutions instead of trying to create new ones and innovate?
I’m saying that’s the way to make money. You’ll probably have to solve problems along the way, but helping people do what they already want to do in a better way is a better approach to understanding what matters in a market.
But if the people actually want to do something in a "better way", it means they have some issues with the current way, right? You can still innovate while solving existing problems instead of searching for new problems to solve, but those are still problems, even if the users don't know it yet.
This comment was deleted 3 years ago
Sorry, I responded before reading your comment.
No, I don’t think you have to solve big problems.
I can go out tomorrow and make money selling hot dogs at lunch time. Is lunch time a problem? Is a hot dog more valuable than a SaaS app?
Does art solve problems? Do sports solve problems? They just meet the market demand.
When you step out of engineer mode and think about what people really need and want it’s easier to build a business that matters to people.
Certainly you have to solve problems. But after your focus is on helping people. That’s the right order.
This comment was deleted 3 years ago
For sure! Purely a mindset experiment. Getting people out of engineer mode and into entrepreneur mode.
I think there's a lot of debate because of the false dichotomy here. You can make money solving problems. You can also make money helping people become better.
A broader way to frame this is that people have wants and desires. Sometimes that desire is solving a problem. Other times, people want to do things better, faster, cheaper etc. Sometimes people want both at the same time.
I would argue that Uber both solved problems and provided value. Uber did tap into an underutilized resource, and solved inconveniences. But in the early days, some people took Uber black cars because it made them feel cool. I don't think these people said, "I have a self-esteem problem, so I'm going to take an Uber to feel better about myself." They just did it because it felt cool.
Anyway, to me the answer is not either-or, it's both. Do both.
You definitely get it, and seem to have a good head on your shoulders.
The main premise of my post is that this is more for people who are looking to start a business that is successful out of the gate.
You're going to need to solve some problems along the way while you build that business. But starting out with the intention of making other people's lives better in an iterative way is a great vision for success.
This comment was deleted 4 years ago
It is weird. All of these bootstrapped founders of profitable SaaS companies independently coming to the same conclusion.
I wonder if maybe we should stop for a minute, listen to them, and entertain the possibility that they might know something we don't?
To be fair, it was purposefully controversial (but still true). Ruffle some feathers.