I built EverLife Key to bridge this exact gap.
I wanted to design a digital legacy platform built on the principle of selective sharing. By fundamentally separating the secure safe(where you preserve your life's data) from the curated hand-off (the specific assets and information you choose to pass on), EverLife Key respects both privacy and legacy.
It changes a cold, clinical data transfer into an intentional act of sharing. I built this to give people the ultimate peace of mind: knowing their digital life is completely safe, while retaining absolute, granular control over exactly how they are remembered and how their loved ones are protected.
The interesting opportunity isn't storing digital assets after death—it's giving people precise control over what parts of their digital life become part of their legacy. I'd keep validating whether customers choose EverLife Key because it's secure or because selective sharing transforms digital inheritance from a technical process into an intentional human one.
Thank you pointing that out support our tool for selective sharing between loved ones.
Appreciate the context.
The selective sharing aspect is the part that makes the problem more human than just a storage/security problem.
It’ll be interesting to see which use case resonates most with users over time.