Feedback on our new landing page

Context: I'm an very light user of multiple clouds, primarily due to their locations, not cost.

Thoughts:

• My head used unnecessary many CPU cycles on the word "agnostic", and thus the headline.
  I think I'd have preferred something like "Infrastructure code you can deploy to every cloud".
  The subheading is better.
• Missed hover effects on some of the menu entries. Again, I think too much if they are links.
• The "Get in touch today" section doesn't make sense to me. Is that a contact form? A newsletter subscription? Will you contact me afterwards? Or what?

Your questions:

• Is the value proposition clear? -- Yes
• If you're somewhat technical, is it clear how the product works? -- Not for me, so didn't dig in.
• Even if you don't care about multi-cloud, is the value still clear? -- Sure, use the cheaper cloud. Though I still had to do price optimization myself, which sounds like a major pain. If you figured out which provider can host most efficiently, monitor it and automatically move around the services, that would make it really easy. (Or I missed something.)
• If you want to know more, is it easy to find more information? -- I found the Docs in the footer, I guess that's where I'd go.

I'm technical enough I guess, and here's what I understood after a glance:

1. You can deploy infrastructure in different clouds.
2. You can do it for me. You might be able to optimize it for me (this is a leap I did. I did not read it anywhere).
3. Since I'm part of a small team, I don't really need it.
4. Large teams will definitely need it, especially where cloud costs are high.
5. In the Why build with Multy? part, I think that the first 3 are not differentiated enough, somewhat overlapping (No Lock-In, More Flexibility, Improve Resilience) - I didn't read what's inside.

Overall I think the page it self is very clear, and to people who are experiencing the problem, will def try it out.

I do think that you focus on the capabilities of the product, not the problem of your users. That could be "high cloud costs", "you want to move from a vendor, but you can't"..

Hope this helps.

Hey Goncalo!

I don't know if I have the legitimacy to judge a landing page, but I really like it! The illustrations are nice and clear, lot of blank space, nice colors...
Some feedback though:

• why not using the logo colors for the illustrations icons, buttons and banners? It might improve colors consistency

• there is a 1px space above the header, so when I scroll I can slightly see the content below

• Is the value proposition clear? --> It is to me

• Is it clear how the product works? --> As a software developer it is to me as well, code snippets are always nice + there is a nice documentation too

• Is it easy to find more information? --> The FAQ works well, and the demo booking is always accessible

One thing that I wanted to know is "how much does it cost?", and I had to scroll down to the FAQ to get some kind of answer. I see that I can run it as a standalone solution, and that you also provide managed solution (which is currently free?). It might be nice to explain that a little more within the page main content, it seems important to me.

But overall it's a good job! And a nice project!