If you are considering hiring an offshore QA team, choosing the right business and payment model to work with the vendor is crucial. The two main models are outsourcing and outstaffing, and choosing between them depends on several factors such as project size, budget, and required level of control.
Outsourcing is suitable for companies without an in-house team, less tech-focused businesses, and those who need the vendor's management of the QA team. It's also an excellent option if you require additional software development services beyond testing, such as design and DevOps.
On the other hand, outstaffing is better if you need full control over the development process and want to extend your in-house tech team. The outstaffing model allows you to hire one or several specialists and expand the team later, making it a cost-effective option.
After deciding which model suits your needs, you can explore various engagement models to find the one that aligns with your requirements. By carefully selecting the right model, you can ensure the successful completion of your QA project while optimizing your resources and costs. You can learn about pricing models here:
Thanks for this.
We're starting to crank out more product, and considering an offshore QA team. That said, automated functional testing has always been a good quality control measure (eg with Selenium).
Any thoughts on hybrid models? ie: Outsourcing / Outstaffing + Automated Functional Testing?