10
17 Comments

Freemium vs. Free Trial: How do I pick the right SaaS revenue model?

Hi everyone. 👋🏼

I'm going to be launching my personal finance application publicly at the end of May. One of the biggest issues I'm having is deciding if I should make my revenue model a freemium (free version w/ an in-app purchase to upgrade and access more features) or a subscription model (with a free 14-day trial) on the App Store.

I never intended to make two separate versions of my application (a free one and a premium one). I've mostly just been focused on making the experience as enjoyable as possible (Zero ads / multiple financial tools/ zero hidden fees / easy connectivity) etc.

Did any of you face this issue and if so what helped you come to a final decision?

posted to Icon for group Growth
Growth
on April 27, 2020
  1. 6

    At Seodity we previously used 14-day free trial. Then changed to freemium model.

    Few observations:

    1. Freemium brings more sign ups(obviously)...
    2. ...which helped us to validate what people wants to use on bigger control group.
    3. On trial people sometimes didn't see the full potential of the product through the trial period.
    4. Freemium allows customer to use our product when he's small, and then buy bigger plan later.
  2. 5

    One rule of thumb I've heard is that if it takes a long time for your customers to see value in your product, then freemium is helpful. If your customers see value quickly, then go for free trial.

    1. 2

      One more thought – if your main customer acquisition channel is Apple App store, you'll probably do better in search rank if your product is Freemium. Apple values downloads above all else for search rank, and you'll get more downloads with a Freemium app.

      Also, you should listen to this episode, it's great: https://www.indiehackers.com/podcast/150-jen-yip-of-lunch-money

      FWIW Lunch Money does free trial. But they are web app, not App Store: https://lunchmoney.app/pricing

  3. 5

    One key thing to understand here is that freemium is not a revenue model but an acquisition strategy, as @patticus says.

    I recommend doing a deep dive into some of the Price Intelligently articles on this topic. Especially interesting if you read both their views: for and against the freemium model.

    1. 1

      This was incredibly helpful, thank you for sharing this! I read and watched the sides for and against the freemium model and it makes a lot more sense now. I was really looking for data to help me figure this one out and those two sites provided just that.

      Thanks again @kacper super helpful!

    2. 1

      These are great references thank you!

  4. 2

    Customers often times can be hesitant to start a free trial. This means you'll have to get creative with how you word it...intercom does a good job at this!

    1. 1

      Intercom does a phenomenal job at reducing friction. When we onboard any new users, I always give them a quick message in-app using Intercom welcoming them to the platform.

  5. 2

    Subscription model with long money-back guarantee period. Two or even three months. And you better have features that I want to pay you, not just a same set of features of already some free to use app.

    Why? 14 days is enough for let's say a product that can simplify your online marketing strategies. You pick what you want and it suggest you some steps... And you have 14 days to try it out, in the next two weeks you'll for sure think about some posts on social media, and then decide if you want to continue with it.

    BUT, for the personal finance, 14 days is nothing. As a user of one personal finance app I see the value of it in let's say monthly reports. Where do I stand at the end of the month. Even to compare it with previous months. And THERE I expect your differentiator.

    Work on your killer features and communicate from the beginning what users gets for his money.

  6. 2

    If the time taken for the user to derive benefit/value is longer, go for freemium. If it is immediate or can happen within the free trial period then go for free trial.

  7. 2

    For what it's worth, we've tried it all while building Obie. Freemium is great if you have significant volume from your distribution channels and clearly have product market fit, Otherwise, it can be a giant distraction. If you're unsure, what has been effective for us is gating everything (Book a Call - only) and forcing prospective users to talk to us first—you'll learn a lot, at the very least.

    1. 1

      You can also a/b test the different options and run a cohort analysis to see which activates / retains at the most effective rate.

  8. 2

    We're a website builder and it takes a while for our customers to finish their sites.

    Longer than 14 days. Maybe 30 day trial would do and we should test it.

    But for now we let visitors try the builder without even using an email. That skyrocketed how many people got inside the app.

  9. 1

    As many people here have noted, the answer to this question is "it depends."

    Do you have an army of influencers who will promote your product and educate people why they should be using it and how to use it? If you can pull this off - you can charge right off the bat.

    Are you going to rely on ads to promote your product? It would be hard to convert a "cold" lead right into a purchase, so it would make sense to lower barrier to entry as much as you can.

    But then another set of questions:

    • Is your freemium enough to make people enjoy the product and stick?
    • Is your premium layer compelling enough to make those free users want to pay for it?
    • Is there some "customer nurturing" / "customer lifecycle" thing going on, where you would gradually educate your free customers on why premium layer has a lot more value for them than a free one?
    • etc.

    PS: I recently recorded a video sharing our thought process behind having a "7 day 7 dollar" trial for our SaaS. It might give you a few more ideas - https://youtu.be/09avD7Y4xpc

  10. 1

    By all means go with the subscription model, with a 14-day trial. Personal finance is exactly in the same psychological category of gyms. High initial excitement that just decreases over time (I'll get in shape, get a gym membership, drop it after a month or so), so your chances of converting get lower every day.

    You need to get the customer's money as soon as you can.

    Other categories of apps are the opposite. Like Dropbox. They catch you with free because they know that once you have all your files there it's hard to let go and you'll end up paying to avoid the inconvenience of moving your files over to another service.

    As a last example, compare Mint vs YNAB. The first one is free. Everybody has an account with them that just check once a year maybe. People that have the latter are much more committed an loyal customers.

    Go with subscription, you'll do much better.

    1. 1

      Hi @typologist I agree with you. I’ve checked the data and everything for my service seems to be pointing toward Subscription w/ free trial. However, I’m not trying to bait users. I want to create an experience that users are actually going to enjoy looking forward to using. An experience that is custom tailored just for them in every aspect. That’s going to be the defining difference between one-size-fits-all finance apps like Mint/Truebill and ours.

  11. 1

    This comment was deleted 6 years ago.

Trending on Indie Hackers
7 years in agency, 200+ B2B campaigns, now building Outbound Glow User Avatar 102 comments 11 Weeks Ago I Had 0 Users. Now VIDI Has Reviewed $10M+ in Contracts - and I’m Opening a Small SAFE Round User Avatar 47 comments The "Book a Demo" Button Was Killing My Pipeline. Here's What I Replaced It With. User Avatar 41 comments I built a desktop app to move files between cloud providers without subscriptions or CLI User Avatar 24 comments How I built an AI workflow with preview, approval, and monitoring User Avatar 23 comments My AI bill was bleeding me dry, so I built a "Smart Meter" for LLMs User Avatar 19 comments