I'm super excited to be building again after almost 4 years since I launched my last product.
For a quick summary of my story:
That just about covers it all, but I think a longer post unpacking this journey might be worthwhile. So here we go...
At the end of 2020, in the height of the pandemic, I made what seemed like a crazy decision. I left my Director-level position at GitHub to become a solo indie founder. I attended a coding bootcamp to sharpen my technical skills and then got to work building.
In early 2021, I launched Thread Creator, a tool for creating and scheduling Twitter threads. I built it because I couldn't find a scheduling tool that worked for me, and I was determined to actually finish something instead of letting it become another abandoned side project.
The product gained traction slowly but surely. Over the next two years, it grew to over 10,000 users with 250+ paid subscriptions. It wasn't life-changing money, but it was ramen profitable and proof that I could build something people would pay for.
Then Elon Musk acquired Twitter.
The API changes that followed completely upended the economics of Thread Creator. The new API pricing structure would have destroyed the unit economics of the business. When someone reached out with an acquisition offer, I didn't hesitate. The deal was done in a couple of days.
Just like that, my first product was sold.
With some capital from the exit and a taste for building startups, I decided to try something different. I joined Antler, a London-based startup accelerator, for their 10-week program.
I teamed up with two co-founders and we pitched an AI-powered compliance tool for large financial institutions. The idea was solid: help banks and financial services companies navigate their complex regulatory obligations more efficiently using AI.
We raised £120k (~$150k USD) in pre-seed funding. We built a working prototype. We even signed several proof-of-concept deals with potential customers.
And then reality hit us in the face.
Enterprise sales cycles are LONG. Much longer than we anticipated. Much longer than our runway could support. We ran out of cash before we could convert those POCs into paying contracts.
About 9 months after we started, it was over.
After the startup failed, I returned to GitHub. I'm grateful they welcomed me back, and honestly, it was a relief to have stability again while I processed what had happened.
The lessons from that experience were invaluable:
I decided that my next venture would be different. I'd build side projects while working full-time. I'd only consider going full-time again once a product started generating decent monthly recurring revenue. No more betting everything on one shot.
In late October 2025, I came across a tweet from Greg Isenberg that stopped me in my tracks:
https://x.com/gregisenberg/status/1983675447805407629
AI-Native Conversational Forms ($1M+ ARR)
every website uses forms, but they're outdated yet typeform does $140M+ In ARR
imagine replacing those static boxes with an AI that talks to you, asks follow-up questions, and fills itself out as you type. onboarding, applications, and surveys suddenly feel human instead of robotic.
feels like the obvious next evolution of where the internet is going
He was absolutely right. Forms are everywhere, on every website, in every app, but they haven't fundamentally changed in decades. You fill out static fields, one after another, in a rigid structure that feels robotic.
I couldn't stop thinking about it. What if forms could feel like a conversation instead?
The project I'm now working on is Formbot, an AI-native conversational form builder.
Here's the core idea: instead of filling out boring static forms, your users can simply have a conversation. They type naturally, and the AI asks follow-up questions, clarifies ambiguous responses, and ensures all the necessary information is captured before marking the form as complete.
What makes Formbot different:
I think it's a pretty neat use case for AI, and I'm really interested to see how folks use it.
The obvious applications are things like:
But I suspect people will come up with use cases I haven't even thought of yet.
Building Formbot feels different from both Thread Creator and the VC-funded startup:
Compared to Thread Creator (2021):
Compared to the VC startup (2023-2024):
The biggest difference? I'm patient this time. I know that SaaS is a long game. I've lived through "the long, slow SaaS ramp of death" before. I know it takes time.
Formbot is live at tryformbot.com. I'm actively talking to early users, iterating on feedback, and improving the product every day.
I'm building in public and sharing the journey as I go. If you're interested in conversational forms, AI-powered form building, or just want to follow along on another indie hacker journey, I'd love to have you along for the ride.
Let me know what you think of Formbot! I'm always eager to hear feedback, ideas, and use cases I haven't considered.
You can also follow along on X to see how things progress!
Fascinating journey. Most discussions focus on going from bootstrapped to VC-funded, but not as many founders talk openly about what happens after. It takes a lot of self-awareness to reassess the path and make changes based on what the business actually needs. Looking back, what's the biggest lesson you learned from experiencing both sides of the equation?
That’s a big loop to complete — going VC-backed and then choosing to bootstrap again usually sharpens focus fast.
At this point, what’s the one outcome you’re optimizing for to know this direction is working — fewer distractions, faster iteration, or clearer user pull?