6
18 Comments

GEO for Small Business, Simplified

I’ve spent most of my career bouncing between two worlds: small business and technology.

And every time there’s a major shift in tech, I see the same thing happen.

Large companies hire consultants, agencies and specialized teams to figure it out early.

Small businesses get told six months later that everything has changed.

That’s a big part of why we built ThisIsGEO.ai.

AI search is changing how people discover businesses. Instead of only Googling “best plumber near me” or “best skincare brand,” people are increasingly asking ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and other AI tools for a recommendation.

The problem is that most small business owners have no idea whether those systems can even find them, understand what they do, or consider them credible enough to recommend.

And the tools emerging around GEO tend to skew toward enterprise marketing teams.

We wanted to build something different.

ThisIsGEO scans a business’s AI visibility, shows what’s missing, and gives the owner a prioritized plan to improve it — without requiring them to understand GEO, build prompt libraries or hire an expensive consultant.

Our basic thesis:

Your brand is no longer just competing for the click. It’s competing to be the answer.

This is also my first SaaS product after a long career in consulting/agency work, so I’m learning a completely different set of lessons around onboarding, product behavior, activation and what people actually do versus what you expect them to do.

We’re live in Beta now, with the formal launch next week.

I’d love feedback from other builders — particularly on the positioning and the SMB angle.

Would you immediately understand what problem this solves? And if you were building it, what would you obsess over first: the scan, the recommendations, or ongoing AI visibility monitoring?

https://thisisgeo.ai

#DoYouGEO

posted toAvatar for product This is GEO By Inflection Point
This is GEO By Inflection Point
  1. 2

    The SMB angle is clear from the post. Curious whether early users understand “AI visibility” immediately, or whether that still needs explanation.

    1. 1

      That’s been one of the biggest things we’ve learned in beta. “AI visibility” makes sense once you explain it, but it isn’t yet a phrase most small business owners immediately recognize.

      We’ve been shifting the language toward the actual question they care about: When someone asks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, etc. for a business like yours, can AI find you, understand what you do, and include you in the answer?

      Then “AI visibility” becomes the shorthand for measuring that.

      The interesting UX challenge has been explaining enough to make the problem click without making a small business owner feel like they need to learn an entirely new branch of marketing first. That’s really the reason we built GEO the way we did.

      1. 1

        That’s a useful distinction. Sounds like the language itself has become part of what you’re learning from the market.

        What’s the best email to reach you on?

        1. 1

          I'm at Julie@thisisgeo.ai!

          1. 1

            Thanks! I’ve just sent it over.

            Looking forward to hearing your thoughts whenever you have a chance.

  2. 1

    Congrats on the launch!

    Given I am in the same field I checked your site and the results are here: https://kinetixseo.com/seo-check/4NPtrSFZQZ

    Most users don't know what GEO is. Or AI citability. Or ai visibility. Most don't even know AI reads your page differently. I would explain it like: Can AI read your site? Check and monitor.

    The idea itself is great, everyone needs this. Going forward traditional SEO will be far less important then GEO. I see kids not even using traditional search engines, just AI.

    Always open to compare notes :-)

    1. 1

      Thank you (!) and especially for taking the time to actually run the site through your tool. I really appreciate that.

      I agree completely on the language problem. “Can AI read/find/understand your site?” is much closer to how we need to introduce this to an SMB than expecting someone to already know what GEO, citability, or AI visibility mean.

      Where I’m probably even more bullish is on what happens to SEO itself. I don’t think it simply becomes less important - I think it gets fundamentally redefined.

      For years, businesses have competed to rank in the top 10 results on Google. Increasingly, they’ll be competing to be one of the 2 or 3 businesses an LLM actually names in the answer.

      That’s a much narrower window, especially for small businesses. If you’re #7 on Google, you may still get found. If an AI assistant gives the user three recommendations and you’re not one of them, you may effectively disappear from that decision.

      A lot of the traditional fundamentals will still matter - crawlability, authority, structured information, strong source content - but the end goal changes from ranking for the click to being included in the answer.

      And yes, absolutely open to comparing notes. This category is moving ridiculously fast, and I think there’s a lot we can learn from each other.

  3. 1

    Congrats on launching ThisIsGEO!👏 Really cool seeing you take your background in small business and tech consulting and turn it into your own SaaS product, especially as your first one after years in agency work.

    I imagine going from consulting into building and launching a product means a lot to juggle right now, onboarding, customer feedback, follow-ups, research, keeping priorities straight, all while still trying to see the bigger picture.

    I'm an Executive Virtual Assistant with 2+ years of experience, and this is exactly the kind of work I love helping with, calendar and meeting coordination, email management, research, and general admin support, so founders can stay focused on growing.

    Wishing you a great launch next week! Would love to connect and hear more about what you're building.

    1. 1

      Thank you so much - and you absolutely nailed the transition. Building the product is only the first piece; suddenly you’re also doing onboarding, customer feedback, support, marketing, outreach, analytics, and trying not to lose sight of what you’re actually building in the first place. And, in our case, still running an agency during the day (Meet Inflection Point . com) - so trying to prioritize client work.

      We’re officially live now, so it’s been a very full week - but also incredibly rewarding to finally get This Is GEO into people’s hands and start learning from real users, rather than friends, family and colleagues.

      Really appreciate the kind words, and I’d be happy to connect. It sounds like you understand the founder chaos very well.

  4. 1

    "Competing to be the answer, not the click" is a sharp way to frame it. That lands.

    The part I'd push on is the SMB angle you asked about. Small business owners generally don't wake up worried about AI visibility, they worry about the phone not ringing. So the scan result might land better framed as an outcome they already feel ("here's why you're not showing up when someone asks ChatGPT for a plumber in your area") rather than a score or a visibility metric. The metric is the diagnosis, but the symptom is what they came in with.

    Also curious about the six month lag you mentioned. Are you finding SMB owners already know AI search matters and just don't know what to do, or do you still have to convince them it's a real problem? That gap seems like it'd change everything about onboarding.

    1. 1

      I think that’s exactly the tension, and I agree that the symptom has to come before the metric.

      A small business owner may not wake up thinking, “I have an AI visibility problem.” They wake up thinking, “Why is the phone quieter?” or “Why are website inquiries down?” The score is useful once you’ve connected it to that outcome.

      I think SMB owners may be more aware of the shift than we sometimes give them credit for.

      I spent some time on the phone yesterday with a lifelong friend who’s renovating a new home, and he mentioned that every contractor he’s hired has asked him - sometimes more than once - how he found them or heard about them. That really stuck with me. They may be doing it in person as opposed to tracking Analytics, but they're absolutely aware of the shift.

      I’ve seen the same thing talking with event vendors while building this. A lot of them are already dabbling in AI, and a few - including one particularly tech-savvy DJ - are investing in AI advertising on OpenAI as opposed to continuing their spend on Google. They may not use terms like GEO, but they’re absolutely noticing that discovery behavior is changing, and several have specifically mentioned differences in direct website inquiry volume this year.

      So my sense is that the education gap isn’t always “AI search matters.” Increasingly, it’s “I know search is happening on LLMs, but I don’t know how to measure it or what to do about it.”

      And that’s really the gap we’re trying to close. I think small business owners spend a lot more time educating themselves on these shifts than they’re often given credit for. They just may not have the skillset personally to manage website revisions or optimization, and they're hiring inexpensive web devs (unfortunately many I have spoken with have issues with money being taken and sites not completed, or redesigns being dragged on for months) who are either not solving the right problems, or who - because of past burns - have put them off to re-engaging a contractor for more headaches.

      The onboarding challenge is translating what they’re already feeling into something concrete: “Here’s why you may not be showing up when someone asks ChatGPT for a business like yours - and here’s what you can actually do about it.”

  5. 1

    The “your brand is competing to be the answer” framing is probably the strongest part here, especially with the SMB focus instead of another enterprise dashboard. At $6K/mo in beta, it also feels like this could be getting a lot more organic traffic than it is right now. I’d be really curious what you’re seeing between the scan itself and people actually sticking around.

    1. 1

      Thank you - and I agree that “competing to be the answer” is probably the clearest way we’ve found to explain the shift.

      One clarification on the $6K/month: we’re literally just launching publicly this week, including our Product Hunt launch, so that revenue isn’t coming from a mature self-serve funnel yet. It’s a combination of our more hands-on enterprise tier and early beta users/testers.

      Right now we’re seeing roughly 100–200+ visitors a day, which is encouraging this early, but we’re still very much at the stage of learning what happens between curiosity, running the scan, setting up a workspace, and actually becoming an ongoing user.

      That conversion path is probably the thing I’m watching most closely right now.

      We’ve only just started the broader outreach push, so my hope is that as Product Hunt, directory listings, press, founder/community outreach, and direct SMB outreach start compounding, we’ll see the top of the funnel move up pretty quickly.

      The interesting part for me isn’t just “can we drive traffic?” It’s whether we can make that first scan useful enough that a small business owner immediately understands: this is showing me something about how customers may—or may not—be finding me now. That’s the stickiness question we’re trying to solve.

      1. 1

        The “competing to be the answer” positioning makes the press side interesting too. Since you’re already pushing Product Hunt, directories and outreach, I’d make sure the editorial coverage is very closely tied to the SMB problems you want AI/search systems to associate with ThisIsGEO — not just generic “new SaaS launch” coverage.

        A few well-targeted placements around AI search for small businesses, local discovery, and how brands get recommended by AI could do more than send a temporary traffic spike. They can also give you third-party references you can keep building on as the GEO product matures.

        That’s an area I work on, and I have a few angles that could fit this launch specifically.

        1. 1

          I agree. I think for us, we're going to see the most ROI if we push targeted media outreach to the outlets that connect with our end customers. I'm always up for tech/trade press because it lends validation and definitely helps boost AI visibility ;-)

          But in terms of driving subscriptions and users, we're going to see our best results pursuing media that the customers are reading. I'd love to discuss further, though, and I'm always open to a conversation. My email is Julie@thisisgeo.ai.

          1. 1

            Sounds good, Julie. I’ll take a closer look at ThisIsGEO from the organic visibility side and send you a few findings by email. We can discuss the details there.

  6. 1

    Good work. I built a tool in the same niche, but with a primary focus on auditing agentic AI and AI search visibility. Accessbility tree, brand perception, WebMCP and more.

    Congrats on launch!

    1. 1

      Thank you - and congrats on what you’re building too. There’s so much surface area in this category right now that I think we’re going to see a lot of interesting approaches emerge.

      I’d genuinely be interested in comparing notes, especially around agentic AI and WebMCP. We’ve been very focused on making AI search visibility understandable and actionable for non-technical businesses, so I’m always curious to see how others are approaching the more technical layers underneath it.

      Appreciate you checking us out - and good luck with your launch as well!

  7. 0

    This comment was deleted 11 days ago