1
1 Comment

Google was reading a version of my sites I'd never seen!

This week I found out my websites have been talking to two audiences — and I'd only ever checked on one of them.

Humans see the design. The colors, the headlines, the pricing table I fussed over. But crawlers and AI engines read the raw signals underneath: status codes, meta tags, structured data. The version with the lights off.

I run 8 sites solo (bubbacode.com is the hub), and I'd been frustrated that Google Search Console was indexing us slower than it should. So I dug in. What I found on most of my sites:

— Dead URLs were answering "200, all good!" instead of 404. To a crawler, that's a site that can't be trusted about what exists. — Real blog posts were serving generic page titles to bots — the crawler never saw the descriptions I'd written for them. — Share images missing on older posts.

None of this is visible to a human visitor. Every bit of it is visible to the reader that decides whether you rank.

Two days of fixes across all 8 sites: real 404s, per-post metadata served to crawlers, share images generated automatically. The human-facing sites look identical to before. The machine-facing sites are finally telling the truth.

The lesson I keep relearning: the audience you can't see still gets a vote. Maybe the biggest one.

Have you ever actually looked at what a crawler sees on your site — not what you see? What did you find?

posted toAvatar for product Built a 6-app SaaS ecosystem
Built a 6-app SaaS ecosystem
  1. 1

    Follow-on from the crawler dig: turns out the "second reader" idea has a seasonal cousin. Just as most founders never read what the crawler sees, most seasonal operators never write down what August feels like — and October-you is a stranger who wasn't there. The audience you can't see gets a vote; so does the future-you who can't remember. Both need the notes taken now.