Looking for a freelancer to work on your project? Don’t be fooled by their AI-written bios, cover letters, or proposals.
Use AI to pressure-test their proposals and reveal the truth behind them.
Below are the four tests — and how to automate them.
People who understand a problem naturally speak in specifics. People who don’t rely on safe, vague, padded lines.
Ask your AI tool:
Extract every sentence in the proposal that claims:
- experience
- capability
- familiarity
- past success
Then check for each:
- What's missing?
- What question is avoided?
- What example should be here?
What this reveals:
Vague lines usually hide missing skills.
Most AI-written proposals fall apart when you ask them to match the job.
Ask AI:
Find sentences in the proposal that should reference the job post but do not.
For each:
- What job detail is missing?
- What should they have copied or echoed from the job post?
- What does this say about the freelancer?
This exposes:
Good freelancers respond to your job. Weak ones reuse old pitches.
Most people check whether the freelancer’s experience “matches” the project.
It’s better to check whether their experience actually supports the promises they make in the proposal.
Ask AI:
Find claims in the proposal that are not supported by:
- past project examples
- tool usage
- deliverables
- measurable outcomes
For each unsupported claim:
- What kind of project would normally support it?
This uncovers people who:
This separates real and current experience from pretend and stale experience.
Most founders hire by looking for strengths. Experienced founders hire by looking for failure patterns.
Ask AI:
Summarize where this proposal fails:
- specificity
- context
- experience grounding
Which failure is most costly for this project?
Does this freelancer understand the work well enough to interview?
Now you have:
A clear risk picture
A clear yes/no
A clear reason behind it
This is the clarity good systems give you.
You’ve seen the tests. Now here are three simple ways to use them.
This is the simplest way to run the system.
Here’s how:
The AI gives you the breakdown right away.
Use this when:
If you already keep your jobs and proposals in Notion, this makes the process smoother.
Do this:
Use Notion when:
Airtable requires more setup, but it automates everything.
You set it up once, and then every new proposal is reviewed automatically:
Here’s how.
Step 1: Create your Airtable base
Step 2: Add the automation
Step 3: AI analysis
JOB:{{Job Post}}
PROPOSAL:{{Proposal}}
\[Insert all 4 prompts from our previous sections here: Prompt 1, Prompt 2, Prompt 3, Prompt 4\]
Step 4: Save the output
Add another action: Update Record
Choose the same table: Freelancer Proposals
Set the record ID to the trigger record
In the fields:
Click Save.
Done.
Use Airtable when:
If you only review a few proposals, Airtable isn’t worth the setup.
Use ChatGPT or Notion instead.
Interesting take. One thing I’ve noticed is AI is great at surfacing red flags early, but it still misses how people think under ambiguity — especially in product or UX roles. Curious how you balance speed vs judgement here?
This is an excellent breakdown of how to separate genuinely skilled freelancers from those leaning on AI-generated fluff. I especially appreciate the focus on failure-mode analysis—most people hire by looking for strengths, but spotting the risks upfront saves so much time and money. The step-by-step methods from simple ChatGPT checks to fully automated Airtable workflows make this actionable for teams of any size. Definitely bookmarking this for my next round of hires.
Thanks, I will check this out next time while i am going to hire a freelancer!
I don't need to procrastinate; kindly reach out to my email and ask about my website and portfolio.
weavertommieg@gmailDOTScom
Awsome, thanks
Thats an amazing guide!
i've realized that better vetting up front saves SO much work down the line. thanks for this!