2
1 Comment

How I solved "AI Hallucination" in content using a Neural Brain Context.

Hey Indie Hackers, I’m Shubham.
I noticed a pattern while building Aaptics: AI content fails because it lacks a "North Star."

If you ask GPT-4 to write a post, it guesses your intent.
Guesses lead to clichés. Clichés lead to "AI-isms" (delve, tapestry, embark).

To fix this, I built the Aaptics Brain.
It’s a persistent JSONB layer in Supabase that stores the user’s "Strategic Identity."
When a user generates a post, the engine doesn't just look at the query.
It injects the Role, Mission, and Audience data directly into the LLM's system prompt.

The AI stops guessing. It starts executing.
It’s currently in beta and the feedback from founders has been insane.
They finally feel like the AI is an extension of their dimaag (brain), not just a random bot.

Balancing this with my board exams is a nightmare, but seeing the "Brain" work in real-time makes it worth it.
Would love your thoughts on building "Context-First" AI tools.

explore - aaptics.in

on March 21, 2026
  1. 2

    Interesting approach.

    I ran into a similar issue but on the code side.

    When I tested the same code with different AI models, they often didn’t agree at all — some missed issues, others flagged things that weren’t real.

    It made me realize hallucination isn’t just about content, it’s also a big problem in AI code review.

    I’m starting to think relying on a single model is the real issue.