After I shared why the hero section decides whether your website even gets a chance, a few people asked the obvious follow-up:
“Okay… so what should a good hero section actually include?”
I’ve been thinking about this while building AllInOneTools, and the answer I’ve landed on is simple:
The details change by product, but the job of the hero never does.
A hero section is not:
It is:
If users hesitate here, they leave.
If they understand and feel safe, they continue.
Across tools, SaaS, ecommerce, and courses, a strong hero usually needs just:
Anything beyond this often slows people down.
Your H1 should answer this instantly:
“What is this, and who is it for?”
Clarity beats cleverness every time.
Examples:
If users have to interpret it, you’ve already lost time.
This supports the H1 and explains why it exists.
Rules I follow:
If someone has to slow down to read it, it’s too long.
Instead of listing everything, highlight decision accelerators:
These remove doubt. They don’t sell — they reassure.
CTAs should move users closer to action, not explanation.
If your CTA says “Learn more,” you’re usually delaying the moment that matters.
Images can help — or completely hurt.
Good:
Bad:
For tools especially: speed > beauty.
A fast hero builds trust faster than a pretty one.
For users
For builders
For search engines
SEO doesn’t need a fancy hero.
It needs a clear one.
Before shipping a hero section, I ask:
If the hero answers those, it’s doing its job.
Everything else is optional.
Curious how others approach this:
When you design a hero section, do you optimize it for
branding, explanation, or instant action?
Would love to hear how others think about it.
My current bias is toward instant action first.
Branding and explanation still matter — but only after the user feels they can start without friction.
If the hero doesn’t give that “I can just use this” feeling in a few seconds, everything else becomes irrelevant.