Pioneer.app is an online startup accelerator that helps founders track progress, get advice, and get funded. At the core of Pioneer, there is a tournament in which participants are scored primarily through weekly peer-review of progress updates.
The top 50 startups are eligible to get selected by an expert (Marc Andreessen and Patrick Collison to name a few). When your startup is selected, you win the tournament and get the Pioneer offer including a trip to Silicon Valley (after the pandemic), access to a network with other pioneers, an online accelerator program, mentorship, potential funding and much more.
So, how did we get to the top of the leaderboard and win Pioneer in a single month?
All of us, the 3 co-founders at Emcee, had worked on a startup before and we know that startups are built on speed. We started working on Emcee a couple of weeks earlier and were directly focussed on building momentum since that was what was going to make this work. We built the MVP and got our first testers in a couple of days and started brainstorming growth ideas while building out features for our first users.
One of our growth ideas was to participate in the Pioneer tournament and see if some of the other participants knew someone with a webstore or even better, owned one themselves.
The bread and butter of the tournament are the weekly updates. If you want to win the tournament, this is an excellent place to start.
Make it engaging:
Make it quantifiable:
Use links:

During your participation in the tournament, you are able to specify 2 types of goals: âWhat do you want to have done by the end of next week?â in your weekly progress update and KPIâs.
For our weekly progress update, we set goals that were easy to track and overperformed on them. Whenever we said we were reaching out to 50+ prospects we made sure we contacted at least 75+. Whenever we said we were optimizing something we also implemented a new feature.
This is an example from our second weekly update:

Looking back at it, âoptimize mobile MVPâ could have been better.
Unlike progress updates, your KPIs should look to the next several weeks or months, not days. The KPIâs we set for ourselves and that we have tracked over the following month were very ambitious and we knew we were probably not going to make all of them but it put us in a spot where people knew that we are in it to win and weâre not interested in an average outcome.
Not only will giving constructive feedback earn you more points. You will notice that the people you gave feedback in previous weeks might be asked to give feedback on your project later on.
Participants will remember when you gave them constructive feedback that helped them progress, we even got in contact with a few of our biggest potential customers so far through Pioneer referrals.
That doesnât necessarily mean you have to be overly optimistic about another participant's project, but make sure you take time to write something that has meaning and helps the other participants out. Pay it forward!
Itâs easy to forget all the progress you make during a week when you are working on a startup. We started creating a list of all the things we do during a week so we donât have to remember it for the weekly update. This is not only a good exercise to see your momentum build up but it also makes writing the update a lot easier and less time-consuming.
In the end, it all comes down to putting in enough work to make fast progress and how clearly you can communicate that progress to the other participants.
Doing this gave us 90%-100% upvotes for multiple weeks and skyrocketed us up the leaderboards until Pioneer couldnât ignore us anymore and sent each of us an email with the magic subject line: âYou're a Pioneer!â.
Here is an example of a weekly update we submitted:

If you liked it perhaps like or retweet the thread on Twitter:
Good luck & we hope to see you on the leaderboard soon!
This is a great update!
I'd definitely give a big vote to the 'Give constructive feedback' part of this.
I got to top 5 on the leaderboard with Cloakist and a huge part of that was giving extremely well-considered feedback to all of the 20 companies I was reviewing every week.
It took me around 2 hours on a Monday morning to do that.
That, incidentally, was one of the reasons I decided not to take up the Pioneer offer when I was made it. It didn't feel good that the first thing I needed to worry about in my week was giving feedback to other startups, instead of worrying about my own.
Just two hours?!?!
I'm feel spending a whole morning and yet I can't barely do 12! đ
Hi Louis!
Completely get what you are saying, the feedback is something that takes a lot of time and effort. After you get Pioneer there is no obligation to stay on top of the leaderboards though, I think a lot of startups get Pioneer and stop participating. On the other hand, the founders of Roboflow are consistently at the top and see it as an accountability mechanism.
Good luck with Cloakist!
Congrats, I'm glad this worked for you!
I participated a while ago, but got insanely disillusioned and gave up. And I will NEVER get back there ever. This is just like any other contest: you just need to learn to "trick the system". Sure, add emojis, and say stuff that looks nice, but in the end, that's all it is. People won't really read what you're actually doing, the feedback you get is usually crappy and generic.
So, at one point I said: I'm spending probably 4 hours a week doing the status update and giving very detailed feedback, only to get generic and mostly useless feedback in return, and at some point down votes. And what for - to be "eligible" to be selected by an expert? To me, that's simply not worth my time.
Hey @CinematicStudio, I've gotta say - that very closely mirrors my own experience
Another frustrating part of this was the way that you're supposedly being reviewed by experts, but that part is completely non-transparent and you never see what they think of you
Initially, I thought that once you'd get to Top 50, you'd definitely get selected by an expert. At least that would have made it worthwhile.
But when I realized you would only become eligible, I realized it's insanely pointless.
I mean, it's certainly a good thing for the founders of Pioneer, they pretty much get their cake and eat it -- they can cherry pick who ever they wish, but for those participating, it's pretty much wasted time.
Hi CinematicStudio
I understand where you are coming from, before participating we were also hesitant if it was worth our time. We were in exploring mode and wanted to test a bunch of channels to get some traction and decided to go for it. On the other hand, I can totally see why people would not want to participate.
Good luck with your project!
Good luck with your project as well!
My takeaway from this insane waste of time called pioneer is this: making it to top 50 doesn't correlate at all with your project being successful or not.
You can have the crappiest project and have some funny status updates with lots of emojis and get to top 50. You can have an awesome project and not making it to top 50 ever.
In order to make it to top 50, you'll need to put in a lot of time + effort into those status updates, and feedback and all, time that at least for me, is better spent doing real work.
LATER EDIT: And the feedback I got from the other contestants was useless, to put it mildly. It's basically feedback from someone that "has to review something, but really would rather be doing something else". I'd rather get feedback from someone truly using my app, than from someone that barely reads 10 words off my page.