8
16 Comments

How We Scaled an AI Search Tool to 1M Users in 6 Months

The Core Problem We Solved

As a B2B platform, we identified three critical pain points in traditional supplier search:

  1. Buyers spent 60-70% of their time comparing nearly identical supplier listings, often unable to distinguish real differentiators like actual production capacity or compliance status.

  2. Language barriers turned simple inquiries into 2-3 day email threads just to clarify basic specifications.

  3. Trust verification was virtually impossible without costly factory audits - certificates could be faked, but AI could analyze deeper signals.

Our Technical Implementation

We built a search system that understands complex business intent through:

Natural Language Processing
Example query: "Find Chinese manufacturers producing medical-grade silicone products with valid EU CE certification and 60-day production capacity"

Key components:

  • Custom embeddings for 3,000+ industrial product categories

  • Real-time capacity verification via API connections to supplier systems

  • Multi-layered trust scoring (18+ factors from transaction history to equipment photos)

Strategic Tradeoffs

  1. Performance Targets
    We rejected vanity metrics like "AI adoption rate" in favor of our "90% Rule":

  • Product listing quality must exceed 90% of human-optimized listings

  • Inquiry response speed/accuracy must beat 90% of sales reps

  • Compliance screening must match 90% of legal review accuracy

  1. Development Philosophy

  • Weekly model fine-tuning cycles instead of waiting for major breakthroughs

  • "Problem-back" development: Every feature must solve a documented pain point

  • Mobile-first even for complex queries (73% of initial usage came from phones)

Validated Outcomes

Quantitative Results

  • 1M+ MAU in 6 months

  • 60% reduction in quality supplier acquisition costs

  • 75% faster purchasing decisions (42% GMV increase)

Behavioral Insights

  • 8-second searches achieved 89% satisfaction when results were superior

  • Mobile conversion rates 23% higher than desktop

  • Suppliers using AI tools saw 10X lead growth

Ongoing Challenges

  1. Technical Debt

  • Balancing model complexity against response times

  • Maintaining accuracy across regulatory changes

  • Handling hyper-customized requests ("custom mold for hospital equipment")

  1. Philosophical Questions

  • Optimal human-AI balance in high-value negotiations

  • When automation creates more complexity than it solves

  • Ethical boundaries of AI-driven design suggestions

For Fellow Builders

We've found vertical AI succeeds when it:

  1. Augments rather than replaces human expertise

  2. Solves narrowly defined but painful workflows

  3. Maintains transparency about limitations

What unexpected challenges have you faced in building specialized search tools? How do you measure success beyond basic engagement metrics?

posted to Icon for Accio
Accio
  1. 1

    Wow that’s crazy impressive, I had never heard of a tool like this! Wishing you the best for the future esp with the crazy regulatory changes going on atm

    1. 2

      Thank you, Eva! As Alibaba's first B2B AI search engine (launched Nov 2024), Accio specifically addresses regulatory challenges through real-time compliance checks across 100M+ supply chain data points. Our multi-agent architecture with DeepSeek's inference models now serves 1M+ enterprise users, with 20-30% higher conversion rates in cross-border procurement. The team (400+ engineers under Alibaba International) prioritizes localized compliance - currently covering 5 European languages with live regulatory updates.

  2. 1

    Thanks, I love the story ❤️

    1. 1

      Thank you! Really appreciate the support. If you're curious about any specific part of our journey, feel free to ask - happy to share more details!"

  3. 1

    This is seriously impressive—especially the real-time capacity verification and multi-layer trust scoring. How did you balance the need for supplier transparency with protecting their sensitive operational data? Also curious: what was the most counterintuitive insight that came out of modeling supplier behavior across different geographies?

    1. 1

      Great questions! On data transparency vs. protection: We implemented a tiered visibility system where suppliers control what's shared (e.g., showing capacity ranges rather than exact numbers), while our trust scoring analyzes patterns without exposing sensitive raw data.

      The most surprising cross-regional insight? We found suppliers in transaction-focused markets prioritize speed, while relationship-driven cultures emphasize long-term partnership signals - our matching algorithms now account for these behavioral differences.

      What's been your most unexpected finding when working with diverse business cultures?

  4. 1

    Wow. Love the story and love the way it is written :-). These results are impressive, especially your 90% rule. At BlinkBrain we see the same thing: it's not about whether using AI, but if it can actually outperform human benchmarks in precision, trust, and speed.

    I love your multi-layered approach to trust score. We’ve also found that combining verified data sources with custom fine-tuning is crucial to avoid hallucinations and shallow answers that hurt credibility at scale.

    On that note: how do you handle requests that don’t fit your standard templates but come up often enough that they’re still valuable?

    1. 1

      Carlos, truly appreciate your kind words! You're absolutely right - what matters is solving real problems, not just the technology itself.

      For those special but frequent requests, we:

      1. First provide the closest matching solution

      2. Then assign a specialist to follow up
        (Fun fact: Even with AI, many clients still prefer human assistance for critical decisions)

      How does BlinkBrain handle similar situations?

      1. 1

        At BlinkBrain we don't phase the exact same roblem, but help companies building or improving their "Help Centers" and support content to "deflect" most of their customers contacts. Specially critical on smaller companies whose growth tends to blocks teams replying to customer requests, that generallt follow the Pareto rule: 80% of contacts are solves with 20% of responses.
        We use AI to analyze customer messages, develop the contante accordingly and even intercept comms to trigger automatic responses.

        1. 1

          Carlos, really appreciate you sharing BlinkBrain's approach - love seeing how AI creates different solutions across industries. Wishing you continued success with the Help Center innovations!

  5. 1

    Thank you for sharing❤️

    1. 1

      Thanks for reading! ❤️ Would love to hear your thoughts if any part stood out to you.

  6. 1

    This was one of the most clearly structured posts I’ve read here — really appreciate the format.
    I’m building something way smaller (BiasChecker, bias scanner for job ads), but I struggle with the same questions you brought up in the “philosophical” section. Especially the AI/human boundary in decision making.
    Do you think B2B buyers will ever fully trust AI-first signals in sourcing, or will human review always stay central?

    1. 1

      Glad you found it useful! In our experience, AI gains trust fastest when it explains its reasoning (e.g., showing why a supplier matches). For bias detection, transparency might be key too—do you display confidence scores for your AI's findings?

      1. 1

        Right now, it spits out bias warnings like a grumpy editor. But yeah, you're right — transparency builds trust. I’m exploring ways to let users see why a phrase was flagged (maybe even confidence scores).
        Still early days. Thanks!

        1. 1

          Happy to help! Wishing you all the best with BiasChecker.