I built AI E-commerce Visual Studio, a small Windows desktop app for e-commerce product photo cleanup.
The problem came from a simple workflow: sellers often have 50–500 product photos from a supplier, phone shoot, or catalog update. Doing background removal one image at a time with web tools works for a few photos, but it gets slow and expensive once it becomes a recurring catalog task.
The app focuses on a narrow workflow:
Remove product backgrounds
Replace backgrounds with clean colors or custom images
Batch process folders
Export Shopify, Amazon, Instagram, and Facebook sizes
Enhance product images
Clean EXIF metadata before saving
I made it local-first because product photos do not always need to go through a web editor. The current stack is Python, PySide6, ONNX Runtime / U2Net, Pillow, and PyInstaller.
The free mode supports single-image cleanup and 100 batch removals. Pro is a one-time paid license, currently $6 launch price and $9 regular.
What I learned so far:
Batch workflow matters more than single-image quality for catalog users
E-commerce sellers care less about "AI" and more about repeatable output sizes
Windows desktop distribution is still useful when privacy, local folders, and batch files matter
The hardest image cases are glass, reflective products, and fine hair/fur edges
Product page: https://www.wappkit.com/tools/ai-ecom-visual-studio
I would like feedback from other builders on positioning. Would you frame this more as a background remover, a product photo workflow tool, or a lightweight desktop alternative to tools like remove.bg / Photoroom?
Building the export presets for Shopify, Amazon, Instagram, and Facebook sizes directly into the tool is a smart way to save sellers a step most competitors leave to the user. That would actually show up well in a listing aimed at sellers rather than a general "photo tool" audience.
Have you tried putting it in front of people where they're already doing this batch work today, like Shopify seller communities or VA and dropshipping-focused groups, rather than a broader launch audience?
I'm curious whether the $6 launch price is testing willingness to pay or just trying to get initial reviews up first.
What stood out to me is that you're optimizing for repeatable workflows rather than image editing. I'd keep validating whether sellers are buying background removal or a faster way to prepare an entire catalog. Those are very different positioning stories.