I built a crypto safety tool. Now I need people to break it.
've spent the last several months building Almstins — a crypto portfolio tracker, bookkeeping tool, and wallet safety checker.
The product is built. No private keys required. No wallet connection ever. You add your wallet addresses and exchange CSVs, and it pulls everything together — balances, cost basis, transaction history, and a safety checker that verifies wallet addresses and websites before you send funds.
Here's where I'm at honestly: it hasn't been tested by real users yet. I've built it, I've used it, but I haven't had anyone put it through its paces and tell me where it breaks.
That's what I need now.
If you hold crypto across multiple wallets or exchanges and have ever felt the pain of:
Not knowing your actual cost basis
Sending funds to an address you weren't sure about
Dreading tax time because your records are a mess
I'd love for you to try it and tell me exactly what's wrong with it.
almstins.com — free to start, no wallet connection required.
What breaks first?
This is a good problem because crypto users already understand the pain. Portfolio tracking, cost basis, messy CSVs, and “am I sending funds to the right place?” are real anxiety points.
The part I’d sharpen is the trust frame. For a crypto safety product, “no private keys” and “no wallet connection” should probably be visible before almost anything else, because that is the first objection users will have before they try it.
I’d also pressure-test the brand before more users come in. Almstins is distinctive, but for a product touching wallet safety, transaction history, bookkeeping, and tax anxiety, the name has to feel extremely solid and secure from the first impression.
Vroth .com would fit this direction better as a harder, security-first brand shell. It keeps the product in your favor: same tracker, same safety checker, same no-wallet-connection model, but with a name that feels more serious for crypto risk, verification, and financial trust.
If the next step is getting real users to break it, this is a good time to think about that brand layer before early trust signals and user memory lock around the current name.
Thanks for the feedback — the trust frame point is well taken. 'No private keys, no wallet connection' should be front and center and I'm working on making that clearer.
On the brand — Almstins is staying. It's established, has a growing user base, Spanish language support, and content built around it. The name works for the people it's built for.
Would love your thoughts on the product itself if you get a chance to try it."
Makes sense. If Almstins already has users, content, and language support built around it, then the smarter move is to make the trust layer impossible to miss rather than force a rename.
For this product, I’d put “no private keys” and “no wallet connection” directly into the first screen, because that removes the biggest fear before users even evaluate the features.
Good luck with the user testing.
Thanks, that's a good idea.