1
2 Comments

I built a white-label SEO SaaS and I’m selling it for $1,250

Hey IH,

I recently finished building MergeRank, a white-label SEO audit SaaS for freelancers, consultants and agencies.

The product is complete, but instead of taking it through the full go-to-market process, I’ve decided to sell it and focus my development time on other projects.

What it does:

Users upload a Google Search Console CSV export and MergeRank analyzes the data to identify and prioritize:

• Low CTR opportunities
• Keyword cannibalization
• Content decay
• Quick wins

Each finding includes the supporting metrics, a priority score, an explanation of why it matters and a recommended action.

It also includes:

• Opportunity Index
• White-label client reports
• Custom agency branding
• Printable / PDF-ready reports
• CSV export
• Audit history
• Authentication
• Supabase/PostgreSQL database with RLS
• Automated tests
• Deployment and transfer documentation

The analysis is deterministic, so there’s no OpenAI/API cost involved, and it doesn’t require Google OAuth.

Tech stack:
Next.js, React, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, Supabase, PostgreSQL, Zod and Vitest.

Current status:
• MVP complete
• Pre-revenue
• No commercial users
• Fully transferable

Asking price: $1,250, open to reasonable offers.

I think the best buyer would be an SEO freelancer, agency owner or indie hacker who already has access to the SEO market and would rather focus on distribution than build the product from scratch.

Live demo:
https://mergerank.vercel.app

If anyone here is interested in acquiring it, feel free to DM me.

Also happy to answer any questions about the product, codebase or transfer process.

on August 29, 2026
  1. 1

    I like that it focuses on actionable GSC opportunities rather than another generic SEO score. Cannibalization & content decay alone could save agencies a lot of manual work.

    We’ve been exploring similar SEO workflow problems with ScaleBlogger. Curious to see who picks this up

    1. 1

      Thanks, that’s exactly what I was aiming for — less of a generic “SEO score” and more of a prioritized list of things an agency can actually act on.
      Cannibalization and content decay were especially important because they’re both pretty tedious to spot manually at scale. Interesting that you’re exploring similar workflow problems with ScaleBlogger too — would be curious to hear what you’re working on there.