2
5 Comments

I built an AI brand kit generator in 4 days with zero coding knowledge

Hey IH community πŸ‘‹
I want to share what I've been building this week.
The problem I'm solving:
Getting a professional brand identity (logo, colors, fonts, guidelines) costs $2,000–$15,000 and takes weeks. Most small business owners and solopreneurs can't afford that β€” so they end up with a Canva logo that looks like everyone else's.
What I built:
BrandKit AI generates a complete brand kit in 5 minutes for $29 one-time. You describe your business, pick a vibe, and AI handles everything β€” logo (SVG), color palette, typography pairing, and brand guidelines PDF.
It's available in English and Spanish β€” making it accessible to the massive Spanish-speaking entrepreneur market that most tools ignore.
The tech stack (built with zero coding knowledge):
β€’ Lovable for the frontend
β€’ Supabase for database and edge functions
β€’ Claude (Anthropic) for color and font decisions
β€’ Fal.ai Recraft V4 for SVG logo generation
β€’ Lemon Squeezy for payments
Current status:
β€’ App is live and generating real brand kits
β€’ AI pipeline working end to end
β€’ Payments connected
β€’ Launched in 4 days
What I'm working on next:
β€’ PDF download generation
β€’ Product Hunt launch next week
β€’ Growing the waitlist
Try it here: brand-wiz-quick.lovable.app
Would love feedback from this community β€” what would make you pay $29 for this? What's missing?
Building in public β€” follow along πŸ‘‡

on April 13, 2026
  1. 1

    This is interesting β€” especially the speed + accessibility angle for small businesses.

    One thing I’ve seen is that even with a solid kit, the name itself can still be a bottleneck if it doesn’t feel distinct or scalable.

    Curious β€” are you seeing users struggle more with visual identity, or with naming/positioning early on?

    1. 1

      Naing is definetly a bottle neck, but the visual identity has been a real pain for customers, and have to pay big money for "pro" designers to do it for them and even then they all use the same tools.

      1. 1

        Yeah that makes sense β€” visuals are expensive and messy for most people early on.

        The interesting part is even when people get a solid kit, if the name itself is weak or generic, everything still ends up feeling a bit interchangeable.

        I’ve seen a lot of founders get stuck there β€” they either rush the name or treat it as temporary, and then everything built on top inherits that limitation.

        Do you see users coming in with already-decided names, or struggling with that part before using your tool?

        1. 1

          Until now mostly with already decided names, but that can change quickly

          1. 1

            Yeah, that makes sense β€” early on most people probably show up with a name already, even if it’s not a very strong one.

            What’s interesting is that once the visual side gets easier, people start noticing the gaps in the name itself much faster.

            A weak name can hide for a while when everything else is messy β€” but once the branding looks polished, it stands out more.

            Could see that becoming a pretty natural expansion later, even if right now the bigger pain is visual identity.