I built an AI proposal generator for freelancers
Freelancers spend hours writing proposals that clients ghost. I built ProposalGen — enter your client's name, project, and pricing, and get a complete formatted proposal in 60 seconds. Works for any freelance niche. Free trial: proposalgen.io
My brother actually could use something like this!
Free trial: 3 proposals, no credit card required. proposalgen.io
Most freelancers don’t struggle because they lack skill, they struggle because repetitive admin work steals the time they should spend delivering value. Tools like this show how AI can remove friction, speed up execution, and help freelancers operate more like real businesses instead of surviving project to project.
Exactly right — and the "surviving project to project" framing hits on something I noticed while building this. The freelancers who struggle most aren't less skilled, they're spending 20-30% of their billable hours on unbillable work: writing proposals, chasing invoices, managing scope conversations. That's the ceiling that keeps most freelancers from scaling past a certain income level.
ProposalGen started as just "write proposals faster" but the people who get the most value are the ones using it to show up more professionally — consistent formatting, clear scope, payment terms in writing — which changes how clients treat them from the start. If you freelance and want to try it, proposalgen.io has a free trial.
Founder here — a bit more context on why I built this:
I kept watching freelancer friends lose projects to competitors who charged less — not because the quality was different, but because their proposals were cleaner and faster. A freelancer who responds with a polished proposal in an hour wins more often than one who sends a better proposal three days later.
ProposalGen handles the structure automatically: scoped deliverables list, timeline, payment terms (50/50 split built in by default), revision policy, and a client-ready CTA. The output looks like something a senior freelancer spent an hour on. It takes 60 seconds.
It works across niches — web dev, graphic design, copywriting, consulting, photography. Each generates a proposal tailored to that type of work.
Free trial: 3 proposals, no credit card required. Takes about 2 minutes to see a real output. proposalgen.io
Happy to answer questions about how it works or what the generated output looks like for a specific project type.
This is a clear pain, but the current framing feels too feature-level. “AI proposal generator” is easy to understand, but it also puts ProposalGen in a crowded bucket where every tool sounds like it writes faster documents.
The stronger angle is probably around reducing freelancer revenue leakage. The real problem is not that proposals take time. It is that freelancers lose serious opportunities because proposals are slow, inconsistent, badly positioned, or not tailored enough to the client’s actual project.
I’d position it more like: turn a client brief into a polished, client-ready proposal in under a minute. That feels closer to money won, not just time saved.
One thing I’d watch is the ProposalGen name. It explains the function, but it may stay stuck in a generic generator category. If this becomes a broader freelancer sales/workflow product, Beryxa .com would give it a more serious SaaS brand than a name tied only to proposal generation.
The revenue leakage framing is sharper — you're right that 'time saved' undersells it. Freelancers don't care about minutes, they care about whether the client signs. 'Turn a client brief into a polished, client-ready proposal in under a minute' gets closer to the actual stakes.
We're testing messaging right now, and this is genuinely useful input. The current framing was optimized for search ('freelance proposal template' has high intent volume), but intent traffic and conversion copy are different problems. The landing page headline is worth revisiting.
On the name: fair observation. ProposalGen benefits from being exact-match for search, which matters early when you're building SEO from zero. The generic-category risk is real if the product expands — but I'd rather prove the core use case first before solving the brand problem. Beryxa is a clean name; curious what it means or where it came from.
What would make you feel like a tool like this was actually solving the revenue problem vs. just the time problem? Genuinely curious what signal would shift your perception.
One practical thought here.
Since you are intentionally not over-naming the platform before customer pull is clear, this may be a good case for a lighter naming/positioning audit rather than a full domain decision today.
I can map the brand architecture clearly: FredBuilds as the trust layer, the individual AI employee kits as the wedge, and what conditions would justify a broader platform name later.
The useful part would be deciding the trigger points early: when the product stops being “kits” and starts becoming governed AI workflow infrastructure, what naming direction should carry that, and whether Viryxa or another platform-level name is actually worth protecting before users, docs, testimonials, and referrals build around the current frame.
Not a long consulting thing. Just a sharp written breakdown you can use while the customer-pull signal develops.
I’m doing a few of these focused naming/positioning audits at $99 while refining the format. If useful, connect here and I can put together a clear outside read:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/aryan-y-0163b0278/
That makes sense. Exact-match SEO is useful early, especially if ProposalGen is pulling intent from people already searching for proposal templates.
The signal that would shift my perception is whether the product helps freelancers win better clients, not just create proposals faster.
If it starts improving scope, pricing confidence, client objections, follow-up, and close rate, then it is no longer just a proposal generator. It becomes a freelancer sales system.
That is exactly where the name matters.
ProposalGen can stay useful as the SEO wedge, but if the product expands beyond one document type, the generic name starts training users to see it as a template tool instead of a serious SaaS layer for freelancer revenue.
Beryxa is stronger for that broader direction because it gives you room to build the system, not just the generator.
And I would not wait until expansion to think about it. By then, users, SEO pages, onboarding, emails, and customer memory may already be locked around ProposalGen. Rebranding gets harder exactly when the brand starts mattering more.
If Beryxa is already interesting to you, the clean move is to secure the .com now while ProposalGen can still operate as the SEO wedge. You do not need to rebrand immediately.
I can make it founder-friendly and simple: clean acquisition, secure transfer, no messy process.
If you want to seriously consider locking Beryxa before the product gets boxed into the generic proposal-generator category, message me privately and I’ll give you a realistic founder-direct range.
Proposals are one of those things that take forever and feel like they should be automatable. Curious is the bottleneck for freelancers actually writing the proposal, or is it figuring out the right pricing and positioning for each client? Because those feel like two different problems.
Both, but they're sequential problems — and writing is the one blocking the other.
Most freelancers I've talked to actually have a rough sense of their pricing. What kills the momentum is the blank page: they know the rate, they know the scope, but they can't get started on the document itself, so the proposal sits in a draft for two days while the client goes cold.
ProposalGen solves the writing bottleneck — you get a complete, structured document in 60 seconds so you can actually review and adjust the pricing section rather than staring at a cursor. The structured output (scoped deliverables, timeline, payment terms) also helps freelancers see whether their pricing holds up once the work is written out, which is a secondary benefit I didn't fully anticipate.
Pricing strategy for unfamiliar projects is a harder, different problem — probably a combination of market research and experience that doesn't compress as cleanly into a generator. It's on the roadmap as a feature (anchoring similar past projects), but the core tool is deliberately focused on getting a polished doc out the door fast.
What's your sense — do you freelance, or were you thinking about this from a builder perspective?
yes~