3
2 Comments

I built an AI tool that scores and fixes prompts

Hi Everyone đź‘‹

I’m the solo builder behind PromptFix, a tool I built after noticing that most people struggle to get consistent results from AI because their prompts are vague or poorly structured.

PromptFix analyzes a prompt and returns:

  • an overall quality score

  • category subscores (clarity, structure, context, constraints)

  • specific improvement suggestions

  • a rewritten “best version” of the prompt

The goal isn’t to replace prompting — but to help people learn why prompts work or fail.

It connects to my existing backend API and works on web, Chrome extension, and now a mobile version I’m building with Expo.

Some interesting things I learned while building this:

  • Most prompts fail due to missing constraints rather than wording

  • Users heavily reuse improved prompts once they see structured examples

  • Developers tend to want transparency instead of “magic rewriting”

I’d really appreciate feedback from this community — especially around:

  • features you’d want as power AI users

  • workflows you think are missing

  • whether scoring prompts is actually useful or distracting

Happy to answer any technical or product questions.

Thanks 🙏

posted toAvatar for product PromptFix
PromptFix
  1. 1

    Really like the “teach, not replace” positioning — that’s a smart angle.

    I’m curious though: do users optimize for the score over time? Like, does the scoring system actually improve prompting skill, or does it risk gamifying it?

    Also — have you considered saving version history so users can compare their original vs improved prompts over time? That learning loop could be powerful.

    Overall feels especially useful for teams trying to standardize AI usage.

  2. 1

    Congrats on the launch, looks solid. How are you currently thinking about acquiring early users and gathering feedback?