3
3 Comments

I built an anti-productivity app for ADHD brains — and it is free

Hi IndieHackers! I'm Alex.

Every wellness app I tried made my ADHD worse. Streaks gave me anxiety. "You missed 3 days" messages made me feel guilty. Push notifications felt demanding. The apps were built for neurotypical brains — and for ADHD, that approach backfires.

Streaks trigger cortisol (fear of loss), not dopamine (motivation). For ADHD brains, that's the difference between a tool that helps and a tool that hurts.

The Solution: GentleQuest

I built GentleQuest — a mood-first wellness app that does the opposite:

  • No streaks — we track "total active days" instead. You can never lose progress.
  • No guilt — missing a day doesn't reset anything. You're never starting over.
  • Mood first — check in with how you feel before anything else.
  • Quiet by design — no push notifications begging for attention.
  • Built for overwhelm — one-tap check-in, no 10-question forms.

The Build (Solo Founder Stack)

  • Engine: Flutter (iOS, Android, web)
  • Intelligence: Google Gemini 2.0 for the AI wellness chat
  • Privacy: Your data stays on your device. No analytics SDKs tracking your taps. No ad networks. No selling data.
  • Distribution: Blog (66 posts), Medium, Buffer

The Ask

My goal is to reach every ADHD brain that's been failed by streak-based productivity apps.

I'm looking for:

  1. Feedback: Does the "no streaks" approach resonate? What would make you actually use a mood tracker?
  2. Distribution: Where do ADHD folks hang out online?

I'm building this in public and open to any questions on the stack or the mission.


Try GentleQuest free: https://gentlequest.app
App Store: https://apps.apple.com/app/gentlequest/id6756537464
Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=app.gentlequest.www
Blog: https://gentlequest.app/blog

#buildinpublic #mentalhealth #adhd #founder #flutter #indiehackers

on September 16, 2026
  1. 1

    The “no streaks” thesis is clear, but the real signal seems to be repeat use. Have early users actually returned more consistently with the guilt-free model?

    1. 1

      Honest answer: too early for statistically meaningful retention — I'm at ~75 users over 90 days (GA4), so cohorts are tiny. What I can share:

      • ~36% of sessions are "engaged" (>10s, GA4 definition)
      • Avg session length doubled week-over-week (73s → 157s) after I shipped the one-tap mood check-in — the lowest-friction action is what people return to
      • Qualitatively, "not losing progress" is the single most-praised thing in user messages so far — the relief framing lands harder than I expected

      The real test is D7/D14 return rate, which I'm instrumenting now (GA4 cohort exploration — will publish the numbers in the thread once the cohorts mature). My thesis isn't that streaks don't motivate — it's that streak-retention is borrowed motivation that collapses on the first miss. "You've shown up 23 times" vs "streak: 0" is the same compounding story without the shame reset. If you're building something habit-adjacent, happy to compare notes — the metric I'd watch is "did the user open the app on day 2 of a broken streak," because that's where streak products bleed.

      1. 1

        The D7/D14 return signal is the one I’d be interested in following. If you’re open to it, what’s the best email to reach you on?